Laserfiche WebLink
<br />\. <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />j;27 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />3/22/71 <br /> <br />I: <br /> <br />ii <br /> <br />,: <br />Ii <br />I' <br />" <br />I: <br />:! <br /> <br />Mr. Mohr was confused as to the 10% service charge as stated in the,~eport. He questioned <br />whether this charge was made in addition to the regular operating costs. <br /> <br />'I <br />I, <br />\i <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Teague questioned the meaning of miscellaneous contractual services. The Manager stated <br />these ~e~lces~include out-of-pocket expen~~s to Diamond Parking Service. Mr. Teague also <br />asked _~w1ie:Ehe:&~:'aAyexcess income over $250 . earned. by the Overpark would revert to the members <br />" - '_ .-::::->- --<.,.---,r;' _ _ ,. _ . ~- - -~. -~ <br />the a"ffises5m~I1tftd.i_s.t:d'cS' Mr. !1CKinley said that this excess would be applied against the <br />principarliaym~nf;g;~of the assessment district. <br /> <br />of:: <br />I' <br /> <br />'I <br /> <br />" <br />'I <br />~ I <br />'I <br />!: <br />I <br /> <br />The City Manager_~ugg~sted that, since there seemed to be ~~Qfysion reg~ding the expenditures <br />category of the f~~~nq~al report, .- he would direct his staff to break the report down into <br />more detailed statemeitts for presentation to the Council at a later date. file <br /> <br />Q. <br />3/10/71 <br /> <br />Legislation Concerning:Gun Control; Exemption of Real Property From Ad Valorem Taxes; Tax <br />Increase for Cities; OLCC Re Liquor Permits; Explosives Bill; Raw Milk Issue - <br /> <br />1. <br /> <br />The City Manager indicated that HB 1889 pertaining to gun control will soon be scheduled <br />for public hearing and he suggested an analysis of the bill and its effect on the ti~y <br />be made if the Council was interested in inves:ttigating this issue. Andy Jordan s;{;ated that <br />J <br />this bill is part of an extensive Criminal Code Revision package. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mayor stated his feeling that the ,Council now has an ample package of legislation to deal <br />with and he therefore suggested it set a limit on its activities in the legislative pro- <br />cess in order to protect the effectiveness of those activities. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Andy indicated that the bill seeks to control the sale and possession of firearms, includ- <br />ing rifles and pistols alike and that it would vest authority for the issuance of permits <br />and certificates, as well as enforcement in the State Police. <br /> <br />Since there seemed to be no further comment, the Mayor suggested the issue be tabled and <br />directed Andy to assess the bill's effect on City interests. <br /> <br />2. Andy Jordan ~~$1?ep ~nie_-br4~a to o~tline the purposes of HB 1700 and SB 126. He said it <br />gives the Highway Commn'-sion powers of condemnation for land to be set aside for recreation <br />trails. It appropriates money for such trails and provides tax exemption status for pri- <br />vate landowners who would provide the needed land. <br /> <br />HB 1700 would provide the appr.opriation of funds from the State Highway Commission in that <br />1% of its annual budget would be set aside for trails along highways, roads and streets. <br />Andy felt the Highway Commission may likely support these bills. <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell requested that notification of. the bills' hearing dates be given to a staff <br />member in order that the Council be assured someone will testify on its behalf. She also ., <br />suggested that theaty meet with the County Commissioners and explore the possibility of <br />joint testimony. <br /> <br />3. Andy briefly outlined SB 366 relating to exemption of real property from ad valorem taxa- <br />tion. Andy stated that this bill affects Riverfront and Park Development, Inc., which <br />purchases and holds property along the Willamette River for Park and Recreation purposes. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson then suggested that, although the basic concept of the bill was good, safe- <br />guards might be writ!en rpto the bill in order to protect that concept. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />4. Andy further stated that the bill providing for a 3% tax increase for cities, counties <br />and schools had been introduced and would be heard on March 29th, at which time Mayor <br />Anderson will testify. HB 1500 requiring OLCC to abide by city recommendations for denial <br />of liquor permits will be heard Friday, March 12th and HB 1112 dealing with explosives will ;, <br />I, <br />be heard on Thursday, March 11th. A staff member will testify and present amendments re- <br />lating to responsibili ty of enforcement. J! <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mrs. Campbell asked Andy if a list of city supported bills had been given the Lane County <br />legislators and Andy replied this has been done. <br /> <br />I, <br /> <br />5. f1r. ~1ohr questioned the ,status of the raw milk issue. <br />still being discussed. <br /> <br />The Ci ty .'1anager replied it was <br />file <br /> <br />R. Corrections to the minutes of March 8, 1971 are as follows: <br /> <br />1. Page 1, II. Public Hearing, Paragraph 5 - "The general conclusion of the Planning Commis- <br />sion was in error in finding this development would result in a stable environment for <br />living for people now in the neighborhood. 271 persons signing the petition opposed this <br />complex, and there are now more who are opposed to this type of construction as part of <br />their neighborhood." <br /> <br />2. Page 2, Paragraph 13 - "He agreed that, if the density was computed on 3.2 acres, they <br />would still oppose the project." <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I' <br />;! S. Bills for the period March 8 through March 22, 1971 were presented and read: <br />j! <br />, <br />~ ' <br /> <br />" <br /> <br />3/22/71 - 7 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~ <br />