|
<br />,...
<br />
<br />5~5
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />Ii
<br />Ii
<br />'I
<br />"
<br />
<br />rr -
<br />Ii
<br />11
<br />ORDINANCES; li
<br />,
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />COUNCIL BILL NO. 9373 - Levying assessments for sanitary sewer between Gilham Road and Balfour
<br />Street and between Holly Avenue and Terresa Avenue was submitted and read in full the first time
<br />February 22, 1971, and held over to this meeting to allow proper notice of assessment to be given
<br />owners of affected properties, and is brought back for consideration with no written protests on file.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr.' Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number
<br />only, with unanimous .90nsen~ of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion
<br />carried unanimously and the bill was read. the second 'time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved second~d by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br />vote. All councilmen present voting aye the bill was declared passed and numbered 16190.
<br />
<br />COUNCIL BILL NO. 9352'- Amending zoning ordinance to set criteria for controlled income
<br />and low rent housing was submitted and read the first' time on February 8, 1971 and was, at that
<br />meeting, tabled indefinitely.
<br />
<br />Councilman Williams had requested that this ordinance be removed from the table and given a second
<br />reading. He has been in conference with Planning Commission members and staff and has suggested
<br />a possible amendment to the ordinance which.would.allow densitv uu to 75fu of R-2 PD oensitv iu R-l
<br />zone only, and also would el1m1nate the m1n1mum slte area prop~seu for PuD. Mr. W1II1ams~s 111,
<br />but he called and indicated that he would have no objection to postponing action on taking the bill
<br />from the table, or if the Council wished to proceed, he would be agreeable to that.
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />The Planning Director explained that Mr. Williams amendment would increase the density only in'the
<br />lower densith zones. It was the feeling of the Planning Department that the Council could adopt
<br />portions of the ordinance.without returning it. to the Planning Department.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson felt the ordinance should go back tothe,PlanningCommissio~ for review, since there
<br />did not appear to be an, eJTIergency.
<br />
<br />Planning Director said there was no emergency~;that he was,-aKar,e"of,_and.the legislatimwould not
<br />be needed for the next 15 or 20 days. ""-
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to take Council Bill No. 9352 off the table and refer it back
<br />to the Plannigg Commission with suggestion for amendment.
<br />
<br />Mr, Mohr explained that the bill, as it E now written, would allow extremely high density in the
<br />R-4 area. The amendment would increase the size of units that could be considered under PUD, so
<br />that rather than bringing a project in under a particular zone, ,it could .be brought in under the
<br />PUD process and be more carefully controlled for density, access and other things.
<br />
<br />Vote taken on motion as stated. Motion carried.
<br />
<br />Council Bill No, 9387 - For discussion on this item, see page 4 of these Minutes, Ordinance
<br />rezoning from RA to R-2 PD property located on the east side of Coburg Road between Willakenzie Road
<br />and Bailey Lane (Chowning Swartz) was ,submitted, and no councilman present requesting that it be
<br />read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />Mr, Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number
<br />only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion
<br />carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only,
<br />
<br />Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr, Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage.
<br />All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 1619~
<br />
<br />Rollcall vote.
<br />t
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />COUNCIL BILL NO. 9389 - Establishing register of approved claims and bills approved by the City
<br />Council and designating procedures for approval was submitted, and no councilman present requesting
<br />that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />Mr, Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill
<br />only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time,
<br />carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only.
<br />
<br />number
<br />Motion'
<br />
<br />Mr, Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved andgi ven final passage. Rollcall
<br />yote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered ~.
<br />
<br />I'
<br />Ii
<br />j: COUNCIL BILL NO. 9390 - Prohibiting fuathing or wading in mall fountains, was submitted, and
<br />" no councilman present requesting that it be read in full" w,as read the first time by council bill
<br />i, number only.
<br />
<br />I
<br />
<br />"
<br />II
<br />Ii Mr. Teague moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number
<br />j: only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion
<br />,
<br />i! carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only
<br />
<br />I _."'-~
<br />
<br />1; IJri- :fe~ci9Pse to, a que'sti~~ a:~- -towltar-p:ro'inpte-d thi-;-,;roposa:i, -CiTy-Manager said~ th~t , UUfqt.t;\n:1?-te-J"Y"
<br />.>~irL~g@-i~y::.frifea.-dY- :tyffd~-s;;':'proBj:em-:w.i:th-":,,"15ath-ifrg::; w:_ash~iJ1g "a1id--'0"'amn:g-i-Hrtn~~,=i!ai~' f0unCta{ns:::~This - water
<br />]f :~s,~c:~pe:t).:I:~i3~Tl:g-~Yl-a:t-er;: ang.>i-:.t>~,sn<?t.po~~,ible to ;;i..D-~ta;L"l . f.i}t~.ps7or ;~eep'Tt, cle..i3.,D for.~ this purpose~'-'
<br />Ii Without this ordinance the City cannot restrict tHiseactivities, and it is hoped-it can be nipped
<br />II before it becomes too much of a problem,
<br />
<br />I,
<br />
<br />i'
<br />II
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />4/12/71 - 22
<br />
<br />~
<br />
|