05/10/1971 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

"... 586 e I I I ,i Ii if JI( 'I :1 Ii II I' II II II I: II " " 'I I' II I, I ,I " I, I: ,: i; Ii II Ii I, I: II I' Ii I: II if II ii Ii :1 " Ii Ii 'I L i! II II " :! I' :1 II " i; I' " ,I " I! " II I: ii II Ii II q 'I I, I' ,I II Ii II Ii Ii Ii Ii I: I' 'I I: 'I Ii I! II I: Ii Ii II ,I Ii ;i I' " ,I l' P II " il II I, \\ !: :1 \1 ~ c. Controlled Income and Rent Housing Densities - Article 26, Section 26.05, Conditional Use Permit Criteria for Controlled Income and Rent Housing (b) Allowance of increased density. Delete proposed paragraph and substitute the .fo11owihg: "The Planning Commission may increase the density allowed in the RA and R-l zoning districts to 75% of the allowable density for an R-2 PD. Such an increase is not automatic and the actual extent of the increase will take into account size of the units, nature of the occupants (elderly vs. families) and the consequent demands on public transportation, the road network, schools and recreation facilities. No minimum site area will be required for Controlled Income and Rent Housing under Planned Unit Development regulations." The Planning ComTIrission concurred with the Council proposal that it initiate studies that will have the goal of establishing geographic boundaries within which a minimum and maximum' number of controlled income and rent housing units will be stipulated and overall district densities established. The district- ing proposal that is expected to emerge from such studies should preferably deal in ranges of population density, rather than unit densities; (eg. a count~: by bedrooms that would be a step in this direction, bearing in mind that actual occupancy can never be enforced except in CIR's). In addition, the COmnUssion agrees that it should initiate studies to determine dispersal policies to further define the dispersal policies spelled out in the Community Goals and housing policy documents of the City. Mrs. Niven commented with regard to the second paragraph that this will be brought to the Joint Housing COmnUttee at its next meeting to get input to find reasonable ways to define neighborhoods, etc. Councilman Mohr felt the reference to minimum size PD's should be deleted, and that the PD ordinance should be amended in this manner instead. Mrs. Niven explained that this would cause mechanical difficulties. The Commission felt more study was required before removing it from the PD section entirely. Planning Director explained that this amendment would provide a further refinement for a special area. Further study to arri ve at specifics is needed before amending the overall section. Councilman Mohr said his initial reaction was that this amendment would create a poor-people's zone for the city. Planning Director explained the requirements of the PUD and that they would be too stringent in some cases for smaller developments. Councilman Williams moved that the last two lines of the amendment be deleted, and that the ordinance be considered. Mrs. Niven felt that there was a possibility the Commission would be challenged on the four acre minimum, and this point should be made clear by deletion of the reference to the four acres. There was discussion about Mrs. Niven's suggestion and possible further amendment. Mr. williams stated that his motion stood as originally stated, and Mr. Gribskov seconded. Vote taken on motion. Motion carried. Mr. Ed Adkins requested that he be allowed to review plans concerning a proposed low rent housing development. He was informed that these may be reviewed in the Planning offi ce. COUNCIL BILL NO. 9352 - Amendment to zoning ordinance setting criteria for controlled income and rent housing was submitted and read the first'.'time April 12 ~ 1971 and tabled for> Planning Commission amendment. Planning Commission has amended the bill and it is brought back for second reading at this time. Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, and that enactment be consi'dered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16212. IV. Items to be considered with one motion after discussion of individual items, if requested. Items were previously discussed at committee meetings of April 28 and May 5, with the exception of the last three items. A. 4/28/71 Council By-Laws, Amendment - Councilman Mohr requested that an item be placed on an early agenda to establish a procedure for considering Council resolutions. He suggested that, for certain matters, the title could be changed to "Memorial." The City Manager 5/10/71 - 4 ,I " " " II II i: 11 1; Ii " :1 :1 Ii :1 I " I; II \1 !! e il 'I 'I il " I' ,I Ii il I, II :1 I, I, " :1 I, II II .1 il ii " I Ii :1 I ;i ,I 'I 11 " " " 11 !I :i :\ :1 !: Ii I' iI [I II l' II II " I, Ii Ii :, 'I !, , I' " " Ii I! I e It :1 " I' I' Ii II Ii :1 :1 Ii II Ii I , ! I , :1 II !I il ;1 I e