|
<br />,.... I
<br /> 693 e
<br /> 9/13/11
<br /> I i'
<br /> I Items carried over from regular meeting of 8/23/71 I I~
<br /> III. I
<br /> ,I Appeal from Zoning Board of Appeals Denial, Ing ii
<br /> A. Dean C. "
<br /> II
<br /> 1; :1
<br /> Public hearing was held on this item 8/23/71, but pction was withheld, pending an "
<br /> I :1
<br /> II opportunity to view the site. Council went out on__tour, but was unable to find the ,
<br /> 'I il
<br /> I, location. ,
<br /> I, i:
<br /> Ii ,
<br /> Councilman McDonald said he had gone to look at the property, and Mr. Ing was in the ::
<br /> I: "
<br /> yard and showed him the proposal and explained its location. He felt there was nothing "
<br /> ,
<br /> "
<br /> wrong with the plan. d
<br /> Ii "
<br /> "
<br /> Manager said that, as far as the neighborhood is concerned, there is no dispute if the
<br /> II fence is built in accordance with the request.
<br /> Ii
<br /> :1 Mr. Dean lng, 15 West 35th Place, said he had seen the City Council trying to locate
<br /> I,
<br /> il his property, but didn't realize it at the time. He said that the neighbor who had e
<br /> Ii written the Council had made an on-site inspection, and changed his mind if the fence
<br /> was in the location as planned. He said he would be happy to show the Council the proposal.
<br /> II
<br /> Ii In answer to Councilman Williams, Manager said there is a difference in the grade of
<br /> j! the properties resulting in a direct line of sight between the windows of the houses.
<br /> Ii The question of precedence can be discounted because this is a special situation which
<br /> II does not normally occur in side yards, except on hillsides. I-
<br /> II Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals
<br /> I: be reversed. Motion carried.
<br /> Ii B. Recommended denial of zone change for Byron Nelson from RA to M-2
<br /> I'
<br /> II Located west of Baxter Street and north of Cross Street .
<br /> I, Requested zone change would allow use of lot for storage of -buiTding, mi'iterlals and equip-
<br /> ,I
<br /> II ment. Single family residences lie to thenorth and to the south. ,. - ,~-,...q---------
<br /> I
<br /> I:
<br /> I' Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. McDonald that the Planning Commission decision be
<br /> I
<br /> II
<br /> 'I upheld. Motion carried.
<br /> I,
<br /> II Councilman Mohr returned to the meeting.
<br /> II
<br /> C. Recommendation for approval of Street Vacation (Larry Hirons)
<br /> I,
<br /> !t (400 feet of Spring Boulevard, 700 feet south of Nl rth Shasta Loop
<br /> ,
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> I COUNCIL BILL NO. 9502 - Initiating vacation of 400' of Spring Boulevard 700' south of
<br /> North Shasta Loop (Larry Hirons) and calling public hearing October 25, 1971 was submitted, and
<br /> "
<br /> II no councilman requesting that it be read in full, was read the first time by council bill number
<br /> :1 only.
<br /> II
<br /> I; Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be read the second time by council bill number
<br /> , I
<br /> I
<br /> 'I only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion
<br /> !: carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only.
<br /> "
<br /> :i Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Mohr that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall
<br /> II vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16302.
<br /> I:
<br /> il
<br /> "
<br />I: D. Recommended denial of park vacation request located in Second Addition to Willis Heights,
<br />i'
<br />II east of Knob Hill Lane between East 35th Avenue and East 36th Avenue
<br />II Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mr. Williams that the Planning Commission decision be sustained. e
<br />'I
<br />! Motion carried.
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />:,
<br />il IV. Items to be considered with one motion, after discussion of individual items if requested
<br />II Items were previously discussed at committee meetings of August 28 sand September 8, 1971.
<br />'I
<br />I,
<br />I' (Minutes of those meetings are printed in italics.)
<br />d
<br />Ii
<br />" A. Share a Ride Project, Lane Community College - Mr. Gary Spencer, Director of Transportation
<br />Ii
<br />II 8/26/7l Cooperative, Lane Community College, displayed a model'of a share a ride shelter. He
<br />I,
<br />I' explained that the purpose of the shelter would be to provide an access lane where 'I
<br />,I :!
<br />Ii cars could pull off to pick up riders. He said the bank has expressed interest in the
<br />11 project, and that he is requesting city approval of the concept.
<br />I! City Manager explained that the entire intersection at 30th and Hilyard will be rede-
<br />;1
<br />I signed and rebuilt, and that it is hoped that these shelters can be developed as part I
<br />I of thcit program. There has been some discussion as Jto appropriate locations for the
<br />I shel ters. ,
<br />'I
<br />II
<br />I Mr.?pencer explained that, at this time, he is asking for approval of the concept of
<br />I
<br />Ii the project.
<br /> Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Gribskov that the city approve, in principle, the
<br />II
<br /> concept of a share a ride shelter, and that staff be directed to work wi th Lane
<br /> Community College and the University of Oregon to develop such a program. e
<br />,
<br /> 9/13/71 - 7
<br />~
<br />
|