Laserfiche WebLink
<br />O. Employment of Women by City - Councilwoman Beal commented that she had been de- <br />lighted to read that the City was throwing open traditionally male jobs to females <br />as the result of a study initiated by the Council. <br /> <br />-r- <br />I <br /> <br />City Manager said the report had gone to the Human Rights Comrndssion and that <br />they would probably fOIWard a memorandum to the Council in this regard. <br /> <br />1/5/72 <br />File <br /> <br />P. Report, Incandescent Lighting on Peripheral Mall Street Loop - At the request <br />of Councilman Williams staff prepared a report on costs and feasibility of use <br />of incandescent street lighting. A memorandum was circulated to Councilmen <br />with the agenda. <br /> <br />Councilman Williams said he had spent considerable time lOOking at options <br />available and had found that incandescent lighting was inefficient. He was <br />convinced that the metal halide fixture was preferable to ei ther incandescent or <br />mercury vapor, and could provide illumination at a lower level. Mr. Williams <br />requested that Mr. Poticha, architect, be allowed to present to councilmen some <br />.information concerning this type lighting. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson pointed out that reconsideration of this matter would require <br />a two-thirds vote at a regular meeting. However, he would grant the request <br />for a brief description of Mr. Poticha's proposal. <br /> <br />~ <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Otto Poticha outlined a proposal using metal halide fixtures at a lower <br />level, using a greater number of poles. He explained the difference in cost of <br />installation, and how this could be balanced by costs of maintenanc e and <br />electricity. He distributed drawings comparing the different lighting programs, <br />and catalogues Showing fixtures incorporating metal halide lights. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson ruled that Council would wi thhold any questions or discussion until <br />a decision was made at the Council meeting whether to reconsider this matter. <br /> <br />1/5/72 <br />File <br /> <br />i <br />I <br /> <br />Councilman Williams requested segregation of this item for discussion, saying he believes more <br />evidence could be placed before the Council to assure the correct decision was made and might <br />possibly change Council members minds as to provision of necessary lighting for the downtown area. <br /> <br />He moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to reconsider the decision made at the Council meeting of December 27, <br />1971 on lighting surrounding the mall area and that, without additional consideration at this meet- <br />ing, the item be placed on a committee-of-the-whole agenda, either January 12 or 19, 1972. Motion <br />carried. <br /> <br />A rollcall vote was taken on the motion to approve, affirm, and file Items A <br />through 0, and all councilmen present voting aye, motion carried. <br /> <br />L <br />. <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />r <br /> <br />1/10/72 - 5 . <br /> <br />5 <br />