My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Santa Clara Park Update
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 05/18/05 WS
>
Item B: Santa Clara Park Update
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:16:22 PM
Creation date
5/11/2005 2:42:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/18/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 <br />residents) said this information would make them more likely to oppose, or lean toward opposing <br />the project. <br /> <br />Traffic Would Increase (Q24) <br />27% of Eugene residents said knowing that "traffic would increase near the new park and <br />neighborhood" would make them more likely to support, or lean toward supporting the project, <br />while 42% (compared with 55% of 97404 residents) said this information would make them more <br />likely to oppose, or lean toward opposing the project. <br /> <br />Street System Could Handle Traffic (Q25) <br />41% of Eugene residents said knowing that "the street system in the area can accommodate traffic <br />increases resulting from the proposal" would make them more likely to support, or lean toward <br />supporting the project, while 27% (compared with 34% on 97404 residents) said this information <br />would make them more likely to oppose, or lean toward opposing the project. 9% of 97404 <br />residents do not believe that the street system could handle the increased traffic. <br /> <br />Class Size Would Increase (Q26) <br />25% of Eugene residents said knowing that "added housing would increase the size of classes in <br />some Bethel schools" would make them more likely to support, or lean toward supporting the <br />project, while 53% said this information would make them more likely to oppose, or lean toward <br />opposing the project. <br /> <br />Least Parks Per Person in Santa Clara (Q27) <br />45% of Eugene residents said knowing that "Santa Clara has the least amount of park land per <br />person in Eugene" would make them more likely to support, or lean toward supporting the <br />project, while 24% (compared with 32% of 97404 residents) said this information would make <br />them more likely to oppose, or lean toward opposing the project. <br /> <br /> No Other Parcels Available (Q28) <br /> 45% of Eugene residents said knowing that '`there are no other undeveloped parcels of land <br /> available for a large community park in the Santa Clara area" would make them more likely to <br /> support, or lean toward supporting the project, while 24% (compared with 33% of 97404 <br /> residents) said this information would make them more likely to oppose, or lean toward opposing <br /> the project. <br /> <br /> Support Changing the UGB? (Q29) <br /> 38% of Eugene residents support, or lean toward supporting changing the Urban Growth <br /> Boundary in order to build a park and housing development in Santa Clam. 40% (compared with <br /> 47% of 97404 residents) oppose, or lean toward opposing such a change. <br /> <br /> Importance of Factors (Q30) <br /> Respondents were asked to rate the importance of various actions the City could take. The most <br /> important action is providing opportunities for community involvement in decision-making, <br /> followed by minimizing traffic impacts to neighbors, and preserving prime agricultural land. <br /> Slightly less important are preserving wetlands, improving citizen access to parks and open space, <br /> and providing recreation services to an area currently underserved. Of moderate importance are <br /> maintaining the current Urban Growth Boundary, and acquiring ridgeline open space in the south <br /> hills. <br /> <br /> Advanced Marketing Research, Inc. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.