Laserfiche WebLink
3 <br /> EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />Awareness of the Proposed Project (Q5) <br />50% of Eugene residents are aware of the proposed community park and neighborhood <br />development project in Santa Clara, near Prairie and Irvington Roads, while 66% of 97404 <br />residents are aware of the proposed project. <br /> <br />Sources of Information (Q6) <br />73% of Eugene residents, and 65% of 97404 residents had heard about the proposal through news <br />media. 29% of 97404 residents (compared with 15% of Eugene residents) had heard about the <br />proposal from neighbors, friends, or family. (Note: "Eugene Residents" means 400 Eugene <br />residents, including 66 97404 residents.) <br /> <br />lnitial Support of the Proposal (Q8) <br />36% of Eugene residents would support or lean towards supporting a project where the City <br />would acquire land for a large park in Santa Clara, based on a land trade proposal with a <br />developer. 19% would oppose or lean towards opposing such a project (compared with 26% from <br />97404). 45% of Eugene residents are undecided, compared with 36% of 97404 residents. <br /> <br />Effect of Various Factors (Q9-Q28) <br />The most compelling reason to support the proposed project is that "purchasing the Ridgeline <br />Trail property would protect forest land and stream headwaters." Other factors that would cause <br />people to lean toward supporting the project are: "community members could be involved in how <br />the development would look," "the proposed development would incorporate design methods for <br />ease of living and functioning," ''there would be no change in the total amount of land available <br />for development inside the Urban Growth Boundary," "with the land trade proposal, the City <br />would obtain 207 acres of parks and open space for under $1 million," "the City bas a budget of <br />$1, million to buy park land in Santa Clara," and "city services such as water, power, sewer and <br />streets are already in place adjacent to the proposed development." <br /> <br />The most compelling reason to oppose the proposed project is that ''the project would allow a <br />housing development on prime agricultural land." Other factors that would cause people to lean <br />toward opposing the project are: "added housing would increase the size of classes in some <br />Bethel schools," ''the proposed development would include over 900 new homes and 10 acres of <br />commercial development in Santa Clara," and ''traffic would increase near the new park and <br />neighborhood." <br /> <br /> Regarding condemnation of land, it appears that people were rating the idea of condemnation, <br /> rather than the idea that without the project, condemnation could occur. The same is true for <br /> "without the land trade proposal, the developer wants to develop the entire parcel with housing." <br /> <br /> UGB Would Be Expanded (Q9) <br /> 36% of Eugene residents said knowing that ''the Urban Growth Boundary would be expanded to <br /> include the park and a new housing development" would make them more likely to support, or <br /> lean toward supporting the project, while 38% said this information would make them more likely <br /> to oppose, or lean toward opposing the project. <br /> <br /> Advanced Marketing Research, Inc. <br /> <br /> <br />