Laserfiche WebLink
<br />would bring the code into conformity with recent V.S.Sul?reme Court decis-ion. It <br />is not intended to prohibit' use of obscene language as such, but only when used <br />in a manner calculated to stir someone to conduct which would disturb .the peace. <br /> <br />Councilman Williams questioned use of the word" calculate" wondering 'how ,to de- <br />cide whether any words were the outgoing of thoughts or whether intentionally <br />said to give an opportunity to retaliate if he is hit. City At~orney said the <br />type of language in the present ordinance has been the subject of an inordinate <br />amount of litigation and this amendment is an attempt to give a clearer defini- <br />tion to rerrove the difficulty encountered when going to trial. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />"'-..-. <br /> <br />Councilman Hershner wondered whether it would be advisable to extend to 'the <br />word "gesture" the same language restriction applied to the woi:d ,"-language." It <br />was agreed the comma following the word" language" and the words "make an obscene" <br />would be deleted. <br /> <br />Mrs. CamPbell said for the record it should be noted that the establishment <br />"Gentlemens' Retreat" is outside the City limits. , (C.B.9604 page 62.) <br /> <br />Comm <br />3/1/72 <br />Approve <br /> <br />D. Planning Comndssion Report - February 21, 1972 <br />1. Annexation York/Bendix property on Sarah Lane north of Crescent Avenue <br />(0.5 acres) - Planning comndssionrecommended denial of the petition. In <br />its consideration the Planning Comndssion asked that it be determined whether <br />by consent enough property could be added to close the gap across the north <br />of an unincorporated area thereby creating an island which could be considered <br />for unilateral annexation. This was not accomplished by voluntary action of <br />property owners ~ The Boundary Comndssion does have authori ty ,to expand the, <br />area included in an annexation request if they deem it proper. Good plan- <br />ning indi cates the area should be in the Ci ty, but annexation of these two <br />lots would not accomplish that unless the Boundary Comndssion is willing to <br />increase the area being considered. Hence the reluctant recommendation to <br />deny the requested annexation. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Councilman Williams suggested the recommendation sent to the Boundary Comnds- <br />sion be for approval if the whole area is included, for denial if only the <br />two lots are considered., (Res.2032 March 27,1972 minutes.) <br /> <br />Comm <br />3/1/72 <br />Approve <br /> <br />2. Vacation Jessen Dri ve between Bel t Line Road and west boundary of Irving- <br />dale Subdivision (City) - The City initiated the vacation request because <br />this portion of an undeveloped street is in the path of an SCS drainage Comm <br />ditchpro.ject. Vacation does not ,appear to hamper access to properties being 3/1/72 <br />developed, and the Planning Comndssion recommended approval. (C.B.9606 PagefQ )Approve <br /> <br />3. Vacation alley between 7th and 8th Avenues from Olive Street east, Jacobs/$RA- <br />This vacation is proposed to allow property between 7th and 8th and west of <br />the north/south alley to be combined for development as a unified parcel under <br />the renewal plan. The Council has agreed to co-operate wi th the Agency in <br />steps necessary to the redevelopment program. Moving publicly-owned utilities <br />would be part of the project cost, but cost of moving privately-owned utilities <br />would not be eligible for participation in the project. Under franchise agree- <br />ment with the telephone company, those costs would be billed back to the phone <br />company. (Hearing on this vacation request was scheduled for April 10,1972 <br />at the February 28, 1972 Council meeting.) <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Comm <br />3/1/72 <br />Approve <br /> <br />E. Abatement 3815 Willamette (Piller) - The Building Department reports that efforts <br />since April 1971 to schieve rehabilitation or removal of the building at this <br />address have been unsuccessful. One building has been partially destroyed, <br />materials are strewn about the property creating a fire hazard, and because of <br />general deterioration it is recommended, a public hearing be called to consider <br />abatement. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to call a public hearing to consider <br />the abatement. Motion carried unanimously. (See Resolution 2024 page 63.) <br /> <br />Comm <br />3/1/72 <br />Approve <br /> <br />F. Sidewalks" Dunn School Area (South Willamette) - Mrs. CamPbell said parents in <br />the Dunn School area are concerned about lack of sidewalks on the west side of <br />Willamette resulting in children crossing Willamette at 36th or 37th on the crest <br />of the hill where the traffic si tuation is con$idered dangerous. She asked for <br />a progress report on what is being done in that area. <br /> <br />Public Works Director said individual property owners are being contacted to see <br />whether they favor construction of a sidewalk or the alternate proposal of re- <br />moving parking from the west side of Willamette and installing a pedestrian way <br />between the present curb and the street. Responses ,have not been ,received from <br />all those contacted. He said the City does not have necessary right-of-way for <br />sidewalk on th? west side and the installation would be difficult because of the <br />steep bank. <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />~~ <:,: <br />0,..), <br /> <br />3/13/J2 <br /> <br />) <br />