|
<br />-.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />-,
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />---~
<br />
<br />in the future than the proposed six units per acre. It was
<br />to six would provide sufficient incentive so that PUD s during the next year and a
<br />half could proceed, whereas if held to four units, developments would probably occur
<br />as regular subdivisions. He said he does not believe the difference between the
<br />limit of six and eight per acre received discussion at the Planning Commission meeting.
<br />
<br />
<br />Councilman Mohr asked how the number of six units per acre was fixed, whether that
<br />number was decided upon to allow off-site consideration, with the idea of using that
<br />impact base to consider whether to ask for an amendment to PUD requirements to change
<br />from eight to six. James Pearson, chairman of the Planning Commission, said the
<br />Commission did consider off-site impact of developments, existing transportation
<br />facilities were of particular consideration. He said the limitation to four units
<br />was found impractical in order for developers to seriously consider the planned
<br />development approach. Further that it was felt developments should be kept from the
<br />ridgeline proper to allow a park to be put in after the year and a half period.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal was concerned for those who purchase property under one condition and then
<br />planning processes change those conditions. She doesn't feel the Council can disregard
<br />the overriding interest of the whole City and would really rather see a moratorium
<br />for a longer period of time on any construction to preserve the primitive area of the
<br />City. At the same time she is concerned with the approach taken by Mr. Cuthbert
<br />and Mr. Seder.
<br />
<br />Councilman McDonald said that although the area may be reserved for park use he
<br />doesn't know that the City is financially able to buy park land now held by private
<br />developers. He said he could not vote in favor of the recommendation.
<br />
<br />Councilman Mohr asked what actual change is being made in PUD procedures, whether the
<br />ordinance is being amended or limitations required by resolution of the Council.,
<br />Manager explained that the change in PUD procedure is only as it applies to the
<br />number of dwelling units permitted per acre. The action of the Council if it were to
<br />accept the recommendation would be to direct the Planning Commission not to approve
<br />any planned unit development which exceeds six units per acre within 2000 feet of
<br />the ridgeline. It is an interim zoning plan pending a permanent decision as to
<br />whether changes should be made for that area.
<br />
<br />Mayor Anderson said he feels the Council should postpone action, there being only
<br />five Council members present and only four voting (Mr. Hershner has said he will
<br />abstain because of conflict of interest). A matter having such impact on the
<br />
<br />, ,
<br />o _~....__._...., ______
<br />
<br />community deserves the attention of the full Council. He recommended postponement
<br />tq a_ s~sequent meeting when all Coun,<?il membe~,s are present.
<br />_~ __ .... . '~"~', ,<."/'0' .. _0.- .---.-----
<br />
<br />Mr. McDonald moved seconded by Mr. Mohr to pqstpone action until the June l2, 1972
<br />Council meeting, without going through another p,ublic hearing. Motion carried,
<br />all councilmen present voting aye, except Mrs.,Ci:!.mpbell voting no, and Mr. Hershner
<br />abst aining . . . . .
<br />
<br />E. Bid Opening May 16, 1972 - Public Works
<br />The following tabulation was distributed to Council members:
<br />
<br />Cost to
<br />Abutting Property
<br />
<br />Cost to
<br />City
<br />
<br />Amount
<br />B1idgeted
<br />
<br />Project and Bidder
<br />PAVING
<br />43rd from West Amazon to
<br />west 320 feet (283)
<br />Wildish Construction Co.
<br />Eugene Sand & Gravel
<br />Devereaux & Pratt
<br />
<br />,Contract Cost
<br />Basic Alternate
<br />
<br />$10,511.00
<br />ll,676.60
<br />12 ,381. 50
<br />
<br />27' Pvng $15.58/fr.ft. $1,334.00
<br />San Swr. 342.00 ea
<br />Completion Date: July 28, 1972
<br />
<br />Streets within Poplar Park
<br />Subdivision (626)
<br />Wildish Construction Co.
<br />Benge Paving, Inc.
<br />Devereaux & Pratt
<br />Eugene Sand & Gravel
<br />Streets within 11th Addn
<br />Edgewood Estates (807)
<br />Eugene S,and &,,~rayel
<br />~evereaux & Pratt
<br />Wildish Construction Co.
<br />
<br />'5,201. 25
<br />'4,811. 45
<br />4,851. 75
<br />No Bid
<br />
<br />4,725.70 28' Pvg 11.62/fr.ft.
<br />4,925.95
<br />4,943.90
<br />5,567.75 Completion Date: August 15, 1972
<br />
<br />25,986.64
<br />26,315.75
<br />26 ,0 80 . 9 2
<br />
<br />22,970.12 28' Pvg 996.00 per lot
<br />24,493.65
<br />24,882.32 Completion Date: September l5, 1972
<br />
<br />Streets within Wingate
<br />Park Subdivision (780)
<br />Wildish Construction Co.
<br />Eugene Sand & Gravel
<br />Devereaux & Pratt
<br />Benge'Paving, Inc.
<br />
<br />36" Pvg
<br />28' Pvg
<br />
<br />14. 421ft>. ft
<br />11. 84/ft. ft.
<br />
<br />27,310.02
<br />28,491. 68
<br />29,082.93
<br />29,518.43
<br />
<br />28,l26.35
<br />27,607.43
<br />27,467.60
<br />30,797.13
<br />
<br />,-4/;2.
<br />
<br />Completion Date: September 15, 1972
<br />
<br />5(22/72 - 6
<br />
|