|
<br /> \
<br /> F. Bid Opening, Public Works Department. - June 12, 1972
<br /> Contract Cost Cost to Cost to Amount
<br /> Project and Bidder Basic Alternate Abutting Property City Budgeted
<br /> Opened 5/16/72 (Held from 5/22/72)
<br /> Streets within 11th Addn - - .
<br /> .; Edgewood Estates (807)
<br /> Eugene Sand & Gravel $25,986.64 $22,970.12 28'Pvg$996.00/1ot -
<br /> Devereaux & Pratt 26,315.75 ,24,.493.65
<br /> Wildish Construction 26 . 0 80 . 92, 24,882.32 Completion Da~e: September i5, 1972
<br /> Streets within L9ma Vista
<br /> Park (797)
<br /> Devereaux .& Pratt 21~,826 ..79 19 ,166.,93 Pvg $905.00/1ot(24) -
<br /> Eugene Sand & Gravel 21,334..30 19,794.80 36 'Pvg 10..86/,fr.ft.(not in subdiv.)
<br /> Wildish Construction 21,79'4.44 21,653.64
<br /> Benge Paving, Inc~_ 21,443.45 No Bid ,Completion Date: September 15, 1972
<br /> Opened 6/12/72
<br /> SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS
<br /> Within EdgewoodEstates
<br /> 11th Addition (807)
<br /> Shur-Way Contractors 30,701. 25 Lat $825.00/1ot(28) -
<br /> Wildish Construction 25 ,851. 45l'd~ Serv 129,00 /lot( 29 )
<br /> Levy 46.00/1ot(28)
<br /> ** Qualified Bid - Wil+ not. ac~ept Stm - 331. 00 /lot (280
<br /> .. unless awarded, paving contract. Lat Area Not, in Subdi v-$2 ,268) .'.
<br /> , ,', Completion Dq.te:' August 4,. 19,72
<br /> Within LomaVista Park (797)
<br /> S~ur-~ay Contractors .2,5,9,7,5.82 Lat $588.00/~ot(~4) $10,960.00 $6,780.00
<br /> WildishConstruction 22,955.42lh'~ Serv 163.00/1ot(24) (Stm Swr) (72-73
<br /> . --. -- Levy 61. 00 /lot( 24) budget)
<br /> ** Qualified Bid - Will not accept Stm 56.00/1ot(24)
<br /> unless awarded paving contract. Completion Date: July 28, 1972
<br /> WAIVER
<br /> PAVING, SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS
<br /> Within Brewer Park SubdivisIDon
<br /> Devereaux & Pratt $ 2 ;913. 77 Completion Date: September 15, 1972
<br /> I PAVING, SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS
<br /> I Monroe Street from 28th
<br /> to 550 feet south (798)
<br /> Wildish Construction 21,131.50 20,870.70 28'Pvg$ 14.23/fr.ft. 9,218.00 9,050.00
<br /> Eugene, Sand &.:Gravel, ._. No Bid 24,154.. 46 SanServ 481. 00 (Stm Swr) (72-73
<br /> .' Devereaux & Pratt Incomplete Bid SanDiI' 501.00 Budget)
<br /> . ,
<br /> Completion Date: August 18, 1972
<br /> Public Works Director reviewed the bids. Qualified bids were received on sewers within 11th
<br /> I Addition Edgewood Estates and Lorna Vista Park from the low bidder, Wildish Construction -
<br /> contract will not be accepted unless also awarded contract for paving in those subdivisions
<br /> (third lowest bid on each). Le~ters protesting the projects were noted from Real Estate
<br /> Developers-, Inc..(Hill & Schultz, attorneys, Suite 26, Valley River, Eugene), and Hugh W.
<br /> GobleI', 1111 Elizabeth Street. Award was recommended on Brewer Park - a request for waiver
<br /> of bid pr,ocedure will be presented. Two letters noted protesting the_M~m:r>qe Street P9-ving
<br /> from,28tp. south -, one, frC?m D,ougl9-;S. O.Bacheller, di;st,rict treasurer of' the Wesley.an Church,
<br /> the other from Carl T. Sandell, 7~0 West 28th. Public Wor)<s . Dire.ctor disp).ayed a map to
<br /> Council members and pointed out the 'properties involved. .
<br /> Mr. and Mrs. Carl Sandell, 790 West 28th, objected to the petitioning method for the project
<br /> and its cost, and claimed it would serve only the Steinmetz property, not the general public.
<br /> William Emery, 2885 Monroe Street, said he realized the most expensive part of the project
<br /> would not abut properties whose owners are objecting and that it would be satisfactory to
<br /> him if the assessment is split to put more of the cost on the steeper section. Public Works
<br /> Director explained that the standard assessment policy would have to be followed, any other
<br /> .. sharing of costs would have to be done between the parties involved.
<br /> L. J. Smalley, pastor of the College Cres~Church, felt because of the slight, majority of
<br /> ..... -'r
<br /> front footage petitioning the paving and the higher than average cost, it would be better
<br /> to reject the bid and postpone the project.
<br /> William Petty, 2899 Friendly Street, questioned the cost of the storm sewer cutting across
<br /> his property. He favored the paving because of the inclusion of the sto~m sewer and its
<br /> effect on his propertr facing Friendly. Public Works Director said the storm sewer would
<br /> /<aa 6/12/72- 5
<br />
|