|
<br />be a City cost, about $9000, and w;~ it :~ot for thepav.:l."ng, 'the' dr-ain'age would not be a
<br />high prior:ity project.' " :
<br />
<br />Michael Schull, 2895 East 24th Avenue, suggested the proj~'ct 'be dropped l.V1tii fUrther in- _
<br />vestigation of the problems involved.
<br />
<br />Public Works Directorpoirited out to' Council members on all)ap the loc"ation of the project ~.
<br />and explained the drainage situation as w,ell as front footage of abutting properties" etc.
<br />Conside~aole discussionens~ed with pubiic Works Director and Manager -answering questions
<br />from the Council with regard to Sandells', being prevented from con~tructing another building
<br />on their property, assessment procedures, petitioning procedures; cost of the proj~ct, per-
<br />centage of, front footagE? favoring the project" etc. Postponement was suggested 'to give the
<br />Council opportunity to see the area. 'Public Works Director said any longE?r than a week
<br />would not allow its inclusion in this construction s~ason. ",
<br />
<br />DiscUssion changed to the Lorna Vista project and questions on the engineers' estimates.
<br />Public Works Director explained how the project was planned to avoid service to unusable
<br />property because of the Bonneville easement running through the area. Also"th~ street pav-
<br />ing to give access to the development and its creation of assessment against 'properties
<br />which will not be benefitted. Manager reviewed the problem created when sewer assessments
<br />were levied against properties on which the Bonneville easement lies, and said 'these projects
<br />were put to bid with ~h~ assumption property owners in the area are aware of 'the normal City
<br />assessment proeedure.
<br />
<br />Councilman HeFshner que$tioned the reason for bidding the paving and sewers separately re-
<br />sulting in qualified bids. Public 'Works Director said 'this 'wa.s 'an 'attempt to allow smaller
<br />contrac,tor:s the "oppo~~~i.:ty','ofbidding. He said 11th Addition 'to Edgewood pro'ject 'can be _.
<br />rebid as one projeCt and brought back, but there is no assurance the bids will be as low as ...,
<br />they now stand.
<br />
<br />Mr. ~oh~Il)ove,dsec~rided by Mrs., Beal to award contracts to the bidder with the lowest
<br />unqualified bid"on ,Items I, '3, aIld5. (paving and sewers in 11th Addition Edgewood Es-
<br />'~" tates, and"""sew.ers~'E;~n~I\~F~~r' Park)~~ ~~RpJ,J.Gj:ill vote. All councilmen present voting
<br />'. ~ "." .~....' <:;,.........,~~ - '? -, - ~- - ~ -. . . ..
<br />- - aye, motion carried. -,"-' '" ~',= -- -~~
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to postpone Items 2 and 4 to the June 26,1972
<br />Council meeting (paving and sewers in Lorna Vista Park). Rollcall vote. All council-
<br />men present voting aye, motion carried.
<br />i :1: .
<br />Mr. Mohe moved. seconded ,by Mrs. Beal to award contract to the low bidder on paving
<br />Monroe Street (Item 6) pending inspection of the property. Rollcall vote. Motion
<br />carried, Councilmen Mohr, McDonald, Hershner, and Bradshaw voting aye; Councilmen
<br />Beal, Teague, and Campbell voting no.
<br />I
<br />
<br />III - Planning Assistance Grant
<br />
<br />Resolut"i6n No. 2063 - Authorizing Application 'for Planning Assistance Grant through
<br />HUD ~~. the amount of $50,000, was's'ubmitted. _".
<br />
<br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. B~al tO,adopt the resolution. Rollcall vote. Motion
<br />carried, all 'councilmen present voting aye.
<br />
<br />
<br />I ( .' . ~' .- - . ... ... .
<br />
<br />IV - Int'erim Density Plan - -~ecaus~,of 'the lEmgth me'eting and afte~ a Il)ajority of the Council
<br />indicated a desire to consider Planning 'Commission recommendations on the'south'hills
<br />interim density plan, Mayor"Anderson said the balance of the agenda, .other than that item,
<br />would be conside'r>ed at an 'cidj ourned'meeting ,on jtirle 15;' 19'":72.' He said the dis cussion on
<br />the Interim Deh~ity Plan would b~ ~imited to Council membe~s, with 'questions directed to
<br />them if desired, but no further; testimony would 'be taken.
<br />. . . .' f ." ." - I . .. ~,
<br />
<br />Councilman Hershner noted ,that he would not participate in the ~iscussion nor would he
<br />vote because 'of rep'resentation by ,a 'Illerriber of his Taw firm of a deyeloper in the south
<br />hills 'area; " ;,,' ..' ,'I'
<br />"',' "
<br />
<br />Recomme'ndati"ons of \he Planning Commission (see Council minutes May '22, 1972) we're taken
<br />individually: .'",. . . '
<br />
<br />A. Special Study Area" / . ~~
<br />Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that an area within 2000 feet of the ridgeline '.'
<br />(shown on 'meW attached to Planning COIl)l1lission 'report May 8, 1972 ).~n the southern \.; "':. p '"
<br />portion of the City will be designated as an 'area for sp'ecial study: . Motion carried,
<br />all councilmen present voting aye, except Mr. McDonald voting no, and Mr. Hershner
<br />abstaini:pg.
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />J ~. 3 6/12/72 - 6
<br />
|