Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ed Whitelaw, 4801 Potter Street, said he does not approve in any way the Design Plan <br />because it includes low-density use in the plaza concept as well as very specialized <br />uses concentrated in a large area of the central city. He feels there is no substantive <br />meaning to the Plan as presented and no definite alternatives proposed. Also, that it <br />does not provide for citizen participation and review in that there is not enough informa- <br />tion about the Plan on which to base a critique. <br /> <br />4It Ralph Aldave, 4150 Pearl Street, speaking for the Upper Willamette Environmental Defense <br />. Agency, addressed remarks solely to environmental aspects of the Design Plan. He said <br />the entire notion of concentrated, integrated area for governmental services would de- <br />pend upon its environmental impact - noise, air pollution, requirements for transporta- <br />tion facilities, etc. He said if funds happen not to be available for mass transit <br />then the entire concept would have to be changed. He suggested questions with regard <br />to these problems should be answered first to determine whether environmental costs <br />will be higher than the advantage to be gained by an integrated center. He asked the <br />Council to take no action on the Design Plan; or if it is approved, that the resolution <br />be reworded to provide that any support facilities comply with all requirements of the <br />Federal government and Department of Environmental Quality; and, whatever action is <br />taken, that a study be implemented immediately to determine environmental impact of <br />the proposed Design Plan. <br /> <br />Alan Seder, 2385 McLean Boulevard, expressed the opinion that there is too much wasted <br />space in the Plan in providing for the plaza concept. He said the extent of Council <br />action should be only to say that the various governmental services will explore rela- <br />tionship of various levels of governments and then design and share space to accommodate <br />that relationship. The plan, he continued, is an inadequate way of planning for growth <br />and expansion of the services, and is probably 25 to 50 years obsolete. <br /> <br />.~ <br />James Longwood, member of the architectural firm acting as consultants on the civic <br />center study, reviewed circumstances leading to development of the Design Plan - EWEB <br />purchase of property at 8th and Pearl, expansion of State building at 7th and Pearl, <br />consolidation of County services, vacation of School District building at 7th and High, <br />plans for location of a Federal building in this general area, etc. It was decided to <br /> <br />d;te;mine whether it was advisable to house all tha~kind ~f-development in this -area. <br />The team of consultants, in making that determination, was also charged with developing <br />a concept as part of the p~oject. Mr. Longwood further discussed the meetings of the <br />various departments of the several agencies to determine their needs in developing the <br />buildings and the plaza concept and providing for transportation. He said alternative <br />transportation schemes were discussed at many points - there was no 1990 Plan at that <br />time. The idea was to devise a concept which would allow for transportation needs <br />known at that time, and at the same time allow for alternative transportation if and <br />when it became available. He also discussed parking needs and location of facilities <br />to provide for those needs. He said the DEQ ,had a copy of the preliminary report on <br />this Design Plan when it was first issued, but there has been nothing received from them. <br />All in all, he feels the Plan represents a considerable step toward getting five levels <br />of government to consider collectively rather than individually what they want to do, <br />and approval of the Plan is requested on that basis. <br /> <br />~ I Manager disapproved some remarks made about competence of members of the design team <br />,., I and said he felt some response was necessary to belittling comments made. He noted <br />- that Mr. Longwood was a member of the firm which designed the City Hall and this build- <br />ing, Manager said, is the most successfully functioning building for governmental use <br />he was ever in. Manager said there is nothing in the plan to preclude use of mass <br />transit, hopefully it can succeed in replacing the need for the automobile, but use of <br />the auto as a major method of transportation to and from this type of facility cannot <br />be ignored. So far as the situation now with respect to this plan, it is necessary now <br />for official recognition of its desirability in order for the Federal government to de- <br />sign its building (to be located north of 7th between Pearl and High) to fit in with <br />the integrated concept. If it is to be assumed an integrated civic center will create <br />traffic problems and autos are not to be allowed, it would be better to abandon the <br />idea, because it will be necessary to move people to and from the center. Manager said <br />there is no question that further study of environmental impact is needed. However, <br />there is nothing in this plan designating this is what will actually be built. It ,is <br />a schematic concept showing how the various facilities can be accommodated in this general <br />area and suggests some alternatives which can be included with those developments going <br />ahead at this time. He expressed amazement that it would not be desirable to provide <br />considerable open space nor to have good pedestrian movement between the center and r <br />other pedestrian oriented facilities already located in the downtown area. <br /> <br />_ Mr. Aldave took exception to Manager's remarks and said he did not think it appropriate <br />. for Mr. McKinley as an employe of the City to express his views or to make rebuttal to <br />previous statements on this issue. Mayor Anderson answered that the Council would make <br />I judgment on Manager's remarks. He also disapproved remarks with regard to professional <br />, competence of people involved in the Design Plan. He cited the time and effort con- <br />, tributed, much without compensation, by many individuals in the design fraternity in <br />Eugene for the betterment of the community, and to question competence of these people <br />is highly questionable and in bad taste. Mr. Anderson said it is recognized there will <br />!1av~!c:l-EE:_trade-offs, ma!lY...E9! ;p~~asant, but no one can refute the implication that <br /> <br />1-----' lid. <br />