07/24/1972 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

\ Council Bill No. 46 - Adopting plans and specifications for paving streets within 6th Addi- tion to Oak Hills and Stoney Ridge Road from Craigmont Avenue to 400 feet north was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. . Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16590. Council Bill No. 47 - Construction of sanitary and storm sewers wi thin 6th Addition to Oak Hills was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and title only, there being no councilmen present requesting that it be read in full. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16591. Council Bill No. 48 - Adopting plans and specifications for construction of sanitary arid storm sewers within 6th Addition to Oak Hills was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full. . Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by council bill number only. - ., Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16592. V - .Resolutions Resolution No. 2067 - Transmitting request to Boundary Commission for annexation of Oakway Golf Course area (Hope), held from June 26, 1972 for joint meeting with Planning Commission, now brought back for consideration. I Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to adopt the resolution. Councilman Williams said he brought out the subject of this annexation because of wanting con- I sideration of the question of how to move people to and from the Willakenzie area across the Ferry Street Bridge. Since that time, he has become more concerned about movements from Coburg Road to Oakway Road. Discussion with the Planning Commission, he said, did not indicate the . City has any satis-factory plan, method, scheme';, device, _alternative, or any other system for moving people and goods between downtown Eugene and the Willakenzie area. He said he realized the inconsistency of opposing this annexation after adoption of the 1990 General Plan, but at the same timehhe feels it is necessary, if favorable recommendation on this annexation is to be I made, that there should be public fa6~lities available or someplan for providing those facilities. Councilman Teague wondered whether the City could be able to deny construction until facilities are available after the property is annexed if it is rezoned to come under PUD regulations. Manager answered that if the Planning Commission gave pre-preliminary approval for a PUD it , would be giving commitment to the property owner and at some time they would have to be allowed to go ahead. Such approval could include a phasing program. He doubted whether development could be denied once they were annexed - they could build under standard subdivision regulations. Planning Director noted that-developer at the present time indica~es development will proceed over a six-to ten-year period, the first phase to consist of about 30 units. He said the property would be developed on a contractual basis. Councilman Teague asked whether the City could be forced to annex the 'property, since it is within the City boundaries now, and whether the land could be developed now under County regula- tions. Manager said the Boundary Commission could annex the area to the City. Planning Director said it is his understanding a separate treatment system would ,have to be used and that he doesn't believe the County <r State would authorize it. A septic tank system could not be used for the . type of development proposed. Further discussion followed on pros and cons of traffic movement, sewer facilities, annexation of the area as it relates to the 1990 Plan, problems in this area in comparison to those in other parts of the City,etc. Rollcall vote was taken on the motion to adopt the~resolution. Motion carried, Councilmen Mohr, Beal, Teague, and Bradshaw voting aye; Councilmen McDonald and Williams voting no. dd~