10/24/1972 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

" D. Rezoning from R-l to R-2 4.4 SR area at southwest corner Harlow Road and €herry Drive (Culp-McBride) - Recommended by Planning Commission September 5, 1972 . Rezoning Southwest Corner Harlow Road and Cherry Drive - Planning COnmUssion Septembe~ 5, 1972 recommended rezoning this area from R-l to R-2 4.4 SR, the site review to ensure access from Cherry Drive to the property located in the northwest corner of the site and screening of the proposed development from the R-l zone to the south. Planning Director explained that the suffix "4.4" is being used fo,: the,first time ,to limit units to 4400 square feet each (10 units per acre). Zoning I ord~nance prov~des for use of unit area limitation in R-2 zones and Planning Com- mission recommended it in this instance to maintain a density less than the maximum allowed. \ I I Councilman Williams questioned the proposed rezoning as it conforms to the Willakenzie Interim Plan which limits R-2 zoning to within 150 feet of arterials. Planning Di- l 'rector explained that this is a specific situation where the limitations imposed :. were felt desirable for development of the property since it is adjacent to R-2 zoning! on the west and is different from the R-l to the east. I Comm : 10/~8/72 i Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mr. Williams to schedule a public hearing on the request Pub/ Hrng ~~_t_. the October 24 ,-1_9?~Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. ' ~ -"""';:,-- ~ -,- --~-~ -- - - ... . '~"4'_"'T-"_"'_'" _ __...._4.._.__....~.._..____.,_ ___.~ ._. .___._ __~.",""',,,""_ Council Bill No. 109 - Rezoning to R-2 4.4 SR area at southwest corner of Harlow Road and Cherry Drive was submitted and read the first time by council bill number and title . only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read-in full. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be read the second time by council bill number. only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the second time by I council bill number only. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal that the bill be approved and given final passage. Rollcall vote. All councilmen present voting aye, the bill was declared passed and numbered 16639. E. Annexation of area between River Avenue and Belt Line Road east of River Road (Frosland) - 3.07 acres. Recommended by Planning Commission September 25, 1972 Annexation, 3.07 acres between River Avenue and Bel t Line Road east of River Road (Frosland) - Planning COnmUssion September 25, 1972 recommended annexation subject to an agreement with the Donald Froslands that City sewers will be provided only ati such time as the City finds it can extend service. Manager explained that Ci ty and! iCounty Planning COnmUssions have agreed that this general area should be rezoned tOI :industrial uses and annexed but only on a piece-by-piece basis as decision by prop-; . ;erty owners is made to put the land into use. Comm 10/18/72 . Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mr. Williams to schedule public hearing on the request Pub Hrng ,fE_~__t.~~._O~t=.ob~!._u~~' 1972. ~ounci1 mee~in~ M.~~~!?_12 carrie?__ '!!2_a!?3l!Y:)_usl!! .____._ - _.~ -- -,- - . -.. '",-.._-~- - .~- . .. . Res:~iution-\;No. -2115 - Transmitting to Boundary Commission request to annex area be- tween River Avenue and Belt Line Road east of River Road was submitted. Councilman McDonald' questioned staff with regard to automatic access to City sewers upon ,annexation of the property. Manager eXplained that even after annexation sewers(will not be available and the Froslands have agreed that the. City will not be required to provide sewers until it decides it can. Although connection to a sewer from the prop- erty could be made without further Council action, construction of sewers to which the property can be connected cannot be accomplished without Council action. In answer to Mrs. Beal's question with regard to the reason for the annexation petition, Mr. Saul of the Planning staff said the petitioner. proposes warehousing use of the property and was advised by tne County Sanitarian that septic tank approval would not be given without assurance that sewers at some time would be available. Mr. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to adopt the resolution. . Councilman Williams asked whether sewers for that area are in the process of being de- signed. Manager replied they are not at this time. He said a private sewer system -- is serving the general area, however there is no authority to connect to that system. The County Sanitarian's position was that without annexation to the City there is no potential for future sewer service. With only warehousing use on the property it would appear that septic tank would suffice for a time. 3/2- 10/24/72 - 7