Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> MY,. Mohr moved seconded by Mrs. Bealthat Council Bill No. 113 with unanimous <br /> consent of the Council be read twice by council bill number and title only, <br /> approved, and given final" passage. - Rollcall vote. All councilmen present <br /> voting' aye, except Mr. McDonald absent, the bill was read twice by council <br /> bill number and title only, given final pass'age, and numbere'd 16651. . <br />E. Rezoning Requests -, . - .. <br /> 1. West side of Chambers between -18th and 23r'd from R-l to R-2 (Mulder) <br /> Recommended for denial byPlanriirig Commission' on October 3, 1972. Manager reported <br /> that Mr. Mulder asked postponement of this request since he is unable to be present. <br /> Jim Saul ,Planning staff, showed slides of'the area and explained Planning Commission <br /> considerations of'the impact this rezoning would have". - . - <br /> . ' .,) . . <br /> Mr. Christenseri,-2005"Broadview Street; 'opposed the rezoning saying multiple units <br /> should not be permitted ~outh of' 18th because of Traffic hazards they would create. <br /> Mr. Mohr rrioved seconded by -Mrs" Beal'to 'continue the hearing on this <br /> item until the petitioner is able to appear. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> Councilman McDonald fr~turned to the meeting. I <br /> 2. Southwest corner of C6burg and Cal'Young from R-2 to RP PD (Citizen's Bank) <br /> Planning Commission recommended denial'Oct'ober 3, 1972. Jim Saul, Planning staff, <br /> briefly reviewed history of rezoning requests for this property and said there . <br /> have been no significant 'factors or circumstances which would indicate a change to <br /> allow commercial zoning south 'of Cal Young Road. <br /> ~r. Mohr moved secon'ded by Mrs. Beal to refer this re.quest to a joint <br /> meeting of the PlariningCommission and Council. <br /> In making the motion Mr. Mohr stated a number of questions were raised by letter I <br /> to the Council members from the petitioner which were not answered in background <br /> material on this iss'ue. -.. -,. '" <br /> "- <br /> Councilman Williams expressed strong interest in the rezoning request and asked <br /> Council's .p,ermission' to. speak to it even. ,though he said there would be conflict <br /> of interest. <br /> Mrs. Campbell asked if, in taking the request back to the Planning Commission and <br /> the posstbility of the property's being rezoned, it 'is realized the 1990 General <br /> Plan would have to be amended. . Councilman Mohr was concerned with taking action <br /> on the request witnout'ktiowing details of the petition and felt discussion with <br /> the Planning Commissionwouilld be helpful. <br /> Planning Director called attention to the- fact that public hearing was advertised <br /> and official notice given for discussion at this meeting, whereupon Mr. Mohr with . <br /> consent of the second withdrew the motion to refer to a joint meeting. <br /> Craig Robinson, president 'of Citizen's Bank, said their position is that the Plan- t <br /> ning Commission and staff did not fully consider that the application'was for RP <br /> zoning. Rather he felt the entire consideration centered around whether commercial <br /> zoning should be allowed on that property. He argued that use of that CO!Dner under <br /> residential-professional planned development would be better than multiple housing <br /> on such a busy intersection. He asked for an opportunity to discuss the request <br /> at a work session to negotiate a solution for development of thts corner in the <br /> best in~~ests of the City and the petitioners. <br /> John Axtell, 2573 Sharon Way, objected to the propos.;J.l, saying that any type of <br /> commercial use for the property would increase the traffic hazard at that inter- <br /> section. <br /> In answer to Mrs. Campbell, Mr. Robinson said no other commercially zoned locations <br /> in that area appear suitable for their purposes. He said the question is one of <br /> commercial vs residential, and their application was filed on the basis of the Code <br /> definition of RP Residential Professional uses. He doesn't se~ the proposal as <br /> being in conflict with the 1990 Plan and felt their plans were flexible enough to <br /> enable resolution of any questions in a work session. . <br /> Councilman McDonald commented on the traffic situation at Coburg and Cal Young and <br /> wondered whether a meeting with the Planning Commission would accomplish anything. <br /> He said he would uphold their recommendatlon 'for denial. <br /> :3 '2.1 <br /> 11/6/72 - 5 <br />