Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br />Councilman Williams wondered if including Springfield in the plan had been con- <br />sidered to enable restriction of traffic on an area-wide system. Vern Adkinson, <br />air quality director, said the original plan was on a county-wide basis. However, <br />when consideration was given to mass population centers in which greater concentra- <br />tion of traffic is located, it was deemed advisable to exclude the outlying areas <br />"of the county. He said Springfield was excluded, although they have agreed to <br />(future participation. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />~' <br /> <br />iPublic Works Director in answer to Councilman Keller outlined arterial boundaries <br />jof the Stage 2 and 3 areas. He said there is possibility of changing these boundaries. <br />With the present monitoring stations there is no way of determining a definite line <br />,between different concentrations of carbon monoxide. The boundaries chosen are <br />J those which are logical transportation corridors. <br />I <br /> <br />[Councilman Williams commented that it would seem appropriate to approve the pro- <br />posed plan as shown on the map, staff to bring back a document with corresponding <br />:text for adoption. He said he felt any situation requiring implementation of Stage 3 <br />'would probably also stop industry, and force people to drive farther out thereby <br />: continually increasing the problem. <br /> <br />~Mrii Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to tentati vely adopt the plan as indicated <br />on th~map presented and request staff to rewrite the text for consideration at the <br />January 22 Council meeting. <br /> <br />Comm <br />,'1/10/73 <br />: Ap;prove <br /> <br />IIn making the motion Mr. Williams asked that the Transportation Planning Cornrndttee <br />of LCOG co-operate with the city of Springfield in attempting to develop a plan <br />for the entire metropolitan area in the event of major carbon monoxide concentration, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />(Air Quality Director said this plan is part of a State plan which addresses itself <br />:to all factors of air pollution, including industries. A monitoring station will <br />I be installed in Springfield in the next year which will allow for more input into <br />: the overall program. <br /> <br />'Councilman Murray expressed concern about the use of Jefferson/Washington routes in' <br />the event of severe air pollution situations. He said it would only worsen things I <br />for that residential neighborhood in which traffic is already a problem. Public <br />works'Directorreplied that any arterial would create the same problem in other <br />residential areas. In preparing the boundaries, he said, there was discussion <br />'even of deleting Stage 2 and going directly to Stage 3; it is still not known at <br />'what point of concentration Stage 3 will be implemented. <br /> <br />'Councilwoman Beal commented that the important thing is having the boundaries set <br />'up to at least have some basis on which to warn the public of an emergency si tua- <br />tion. Mayor Anderson noted that before any vehicular movement is restricted, there <br />would be Stage 1 alert warning. Implementation of Stage 2 without prior alert warn- <br />ing, he felt, would create problems. Councilman Wood wondered whether it would <br />curtail emissions more effectively to implement Stage 3 immediately following <br />Stage I in view of the small area covered by Stage 2. Assistant Manager said that <br />until the monitoring equipment becomes more sophisticated there is no absolute <br />solution. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />Councilman Keller asked if more problems would be created, in review of the total <br />,plan, by using the slower streets as boundaries rather than arterials. Public <br />:Works Director said traffic can be moved out much faster on arterials. He re- <br />emphasized that it is not known at what point Stage 3 would be implemented. <br /> <br />In answer to Mrs. Campbell's inquiry about State legislation, Mrs. Beal said the <br />Governor has authority to stop traffic in extreme emergencies. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />i <br /> <br />IA vote was taken on the md;ion as stated. Motion carried, Mr. Murray voting no. <br /> <br />C0unci:bnan.1'furvay--. o0;9e.cte.d' tGl'"t~: plar,i:al!S:" cu.iTent1:r: QJ:'awn. ,.lIe.. d.tdn' t ,feel. St.age 2 would <br />effecti:velY-HcurJ5 autotrafHc.H1S"particular concern with Stage 2 was that it seems to <br />funnel traf'ficlTlore excesSi:vely;, onto Streets like Washington and Jefferson where there is <br />tlie heaviest concentration of'senior citizens in the colrrrnunity and who are the people most <br />apt to be bothered during periods of severe concentration of carbon monoxide emissions. <br />He felt there should be alternatives. Councilman Wood concurred. Manager said the general <br />point of view. is that implementation of either Stage 2 or 3 would be entirely voluntary be- <br />cause the City does not have the manpower to barricade and prohibit people from driving in <br />those areas. In any emergency requiring implementation of those two stages, City forces will <br />be busy with things other than traffic. He said the philosophy behind the two-stage proposal <br />is based on information which the Lane Regional Air Pollution staff gave indicating they <br />anticipated greatest concern in the central business district and the intent was to counter- <br />act any emissions concentration by prohibiting the inner belt to vehicular traffic. It is <br />not anticipated in the foreseeable future that concentration will reach Stage 1, the warning <br />stage. Tests at this time do not indicate that Stages 2 and 3 will ever be used. ,Staff has <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />19 <br /> <br />1/22/73 - 10 <br />