03/27/1973 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

-- o. Disclaimer on Property Through pro~pect Park PUD, - Planning Commission recommended , gi ving disclaimer 10 any interest ~n 30-foot str~p through prop~sed Prospect par~ . PUD since there is no record of the City's having accepted the ~nterest at the t~me : it was given (see February 28,1973 committee). . Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Wood to' auth"rd.~e the disclaimer. . una{limously. : .~.~-t ~~} __,c._~..._ ~__-_____ ~....:... ~_"'" _~ _ ___~ P. -Legislation: - 6.B.4 - Removes priva~~ club lice~ses from popUlati~n quota.LR!9.!!:~biE~~ . dis'cri.mi~ati.on~and prohibits sale to other than members and guests.; ,i C orr:rrn .3V21/73 Motion carrled:":--Approve Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell to endorse S. B. 4 in principle, particularly the portion having to do with discrimination. In answer to Councilman McDonald, Mrs. Beal said in view of Civil Rights and Equal Opportunity ordinances of the City she felt that S.B.4 carries out that aspect of the local laws. Councilwoman Campbell added that the State is extend- ing a privilege in the isst1.ance of. licenses to private clubs practicing .discrimina- -- ,.,. ..,..... -- . ~._- -_.. .-- --, . . -. . -; -' ------- . - "', - - - -,- - .~ tion and this bill would remedy that. Mayor Anderson said the legislation is not precedent setting ,rather a matter of local government having. a tool to prevent discrimination. Councilman McDonald did not agree on supportil)g thfi legislation in its entirety . - Legislative Analyst read portions of the bill having'to do with private clubs and it was understood copies of the bill would be made available to Council members. , .- Vote was taken on the motion to support S.B.4. Motion carried, Councilmen Beal, Campbell, Keller, and Wood voting aye; Councilman McDonald voting no. . Comrn 3/21/73 Approve Qr H.B.2308 I lJ.B.23l0 - Requires new and renovated public buildings to meet standards to be set by State .FireMarshal. Requires uniform signing of entrances to public buildings which meet standards. ~ I C omrn support H.B.230'8 and if~B:23l0. Motion i3/2l/73 . \ ' Approve ~..--.---.__.....~ -_.- _.---~- -'--~- -..-- -.-. --.-- -~._"~- _~~...----J Mrs. Beal moved secOnded by Mr. Wood to carried unanimously. ',:.' R~I S.B.396 I - Authorizes $150,000,000 for non-interstate improvements for safety purposes. Would provide $13,875,000 for-i-mprovement to Lane county. . This legislation is pointed toward safety on non-freeway type roads where engineer- I ing can solve problems in those areas indicated by accident records. Legislative Analyst said that jJ; is coIlsidered a trade-off to the highway people opposing use of highway funds for mass transi t. Hayor Anderson called attention to HJR 7 providing for use of highway funds for mass transit. ha,ving the support df Oregon's three major cities and the League of Oregon Cities. He said the two bills would provide the voters of the State an opportunity to express them- selves with regard to further development of highways as opposed to mass transit. .- Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Keller to support S.B.396. Councilwoman Campbell wondered whether the City would be able to avail itself of State funds as well as any Federal funds which may be appropriated for mass transi t . It was fel t both sources coul d be used. Vote was taken on the motion to support S.B.396. Motion carried unanimoUSly. Comrn 3/2~/73 I , ApPjY'ove I S 'j. H ..B. 2274 - Exempts from property tax variotzs airport located enterprises if . r I revenues from these enterprises go to support the operation of the airport. ~ ./ . Staff recommended support of this legislation wi th reservations. AS now wri tten exemption is cut off for airports serving 300,000 population. In view of the I>O.ssibi1ity of Mahlon Sweet Field's serving as a regional facility, it is L concei vable that tax exelllpt status would be lost. I providing it is amended / r/omrn or more population. 3 2; 73 Approve .-,,~...,.J Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Wood to support H.B.2274, so as not to delete exemption for airport serving 300,000 Motion ca~ried unanimously. 'l3 3/27/73 - 13