Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I. Abatement, 3815 Willamette Street - Recommended on the basis of structural fire ' <br />. , , <br />and heal th ha zards . I <br />,Comm . <br /> <br />Mrs. ,Beal moved seconded by Mr. Wood to call public hearing. Motion carried 7/3/73 _;- <br />unan~mously. Approve <br /> <br />Demolition, 4291 East Amazon <br />Manager explained that the property owner failed to clean up the property on <br />which proper notice of abatement was given. Authorization for demolition of Approve <br />buildings at that location was requested. <br /> <br />J. " - ,,- <br /> <br />Parking District Implementation - Council was requested to call public hearing for <br />July ~3 a~ this time so that the parking district can be started if the July 19 <br />· elect~on ~s successful. It was understood the hearing would be cancelled if there _ <br />, , I <br />~s a negat~ve vote on the pzoposal. <br /> <br />'Mrs: Beal ~ved seconded by Mr. Hershner to call public hearing for July 23, 1973. i <br />Mot~on carr~ed unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />K. Petition, Stonn Sewer between Warren and Louis from 1000 feet south of Bailey Hill I Cornm <br />Road to 2000 feet south - 100% - Mrs. Beal 1lr)ved seconded by Mr. Wood to accept '7/3/73 <br />, the petition. Motion carried unanimously.jApprove <br /> <br />L. Council Minutes - June 11 and 25, 1973 as circulated. Approve ~ <br /> <br />M. Proposed Park Property, Willamette-bet~e~~ 37th and 38th - Councilwoman Campbell <br />asked whether the Parks Department could investigate the possible acquisition of <br />Lutheran Church property on Willamette between 37th and 38th for open space iand. I <br />It was understood the matter would be checked. <br /> <br />N. Street Widths - Councilman Mclx:mald tiio'ught a cOmmittee should be appointed 'to <br />determine minimum width of residential streets. He felt the Council should not <br />,be faced with that determination at time of contract award on City projects. It <br />was understood a copy of the subdivision ordinance would be distributed to Council! Cornm <br />'members and the question further considered after review if it is fel t necessary. 7/3/73 <br />The ordinance contains specific cri ter ia for determining street widths at time of i Affirm <br />plat filing. Plats are reviewed by both the Planning and Public Works Departments! <br />rprior to acceptance. <br /> <br />O. I-l05/lst Avenue Ramps - Request was received from Whiteaker neighborhood group <br />'for'-rec~2deration_o~e19sing the 1st Avenue ramps upon opening of the I-lOS <br />~tension~ -The~~7.lea to-e~~re-again the possibiJity of barricades on the <br />-temporary,ramps while the City pursues the Highway Division's alternative pro- <br />posal of remodeling the ramps (2H) for some $350,000 to provide access to the <br />freeway. Manager repor~ed the group was advised resubmittal would probably not ~.' . <br />be approved in view of rejection of previous Ci ty requests for temporary use of 'W' <br />the ramps to allow time for ESATS updating or to pursue other alternatives to ' <br />closing them. Counci.l was asked whether reconsideration was desired at the <br />July 9 meeting. <br /> <br />In answer to Councilwoman Campbell, Manager reviewed previous requests to the <br />State Highway Division and Federal Transportation Department which were rejected. <br />His impression was that no temporary connection to I-l05 would be permissible; <br />if there is to be access as a result of ESATS updating an entirely new design <br />would be required. <br />I <br />'Councilwoman Beal wondered whether the ramps could be used for pedestrian and <br />bike traffic only in the event future modifications to the Washington/Jefferson <br />bridge provided for that type use. Manager felt any change of that type would <br />provide for pedestrian and bike travel immediately adjacent to the riverbank <br />rather than on the structure farther south. <br /> <br />Mayor Anderson felt any further request for temporary use of the ramps would be <br />_ interpreted as stalling for time. He thought the present contract calling for <br />removal of the ramps upon opening of I-l05 should be fulfilled. He called the <br />'discussion back to whether the matter should be reopened at the July 9 meeting. . <br /> <br />Consensus was that previous public hearing had provided opportunity to hear all ~ <br />considerations and another hearing W)uld serve no useful purpose. Mr. Murray <br />suggested directing the Whiteaker group to the State or Federal authorities with- Comm <br />'out formal request from the City with regard to possibility of implementing 7/3/73 <br />Alternative 2H. It was understood staff would investigate so far as possible I Affirm <br />acceptance of the 2H al ternati ve for the Whi teaker group as well as for the Ci ty. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2.6.~ 7/9/73 - 12 <br />