Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
<br /> .~.. . ;..J.~. , <br /> DEPAlnmlT OF PtJIlLIC WORXS lid lio. In! 0 rm.s1 ~, <br /> "Engineering Division ; <br /> July 6, 1973 <br />. - +--- Cost to .-..t.:.:":'..lut <br /> ::,__. .If lliJder and Project Contract Coat Ab<lttl:>8 Prop. Cost to Cit). Budb.tc~ <br /> -- <br /> i <br /> 1,"j Slurry Se~1 Projects (979) I <br /> l32 streets) I <br /> -~~':Q Paving.................................. .......$ 30.452.66........................... .0. ...... ...................$ 30.482.66..........$ 30.JOO.00 <br /> ---------- - ------------------------ <br /> 20 0,"r1ay Projects (97.) <br /> _ubene Sand and Gravel. Inc... ......... .'. ... .... ...$132.778.25.... .............o.o... .....0............... ........ ...$132.778.25........ ..$125.000.00 <br /> ~ ildish Coutrl>ctic:l COlllpany...o.......o......o.... .$148. 754.25 <br /> ------------------------------------------------ - ---------------------- <br /> ~_.~.~ Overlay - Garfield Street <br /> if__ oth A~e. :0 7th Ave. (979) <br /> ~ildisb Construction Company........................$ 2.310.00.... .............. ........ .:0................ ... ........$ 2,310.00......... .$ 2.300. 'JO <br /> :::usene Sand and Gravel, lnc.........................$ 2,930.00 <br /> --------------------- -------- -------------------------------------------------------- <br /> .- .... . A___.___.__ _ - ,._.-..._~-_.__.- -._- - ._---.-~ -_. 'C._ ___________ _ 'M...._.._.._______,.._._~__...,.._. _ __ _ _.____.w._...._ <br /> Public Works Director reviewed the bids. ~ontract award was recommended to the bidder on the <br /> slurry seal proj eels, 'and' to the low bidder on each of the over lay proj ects . <br />. Public hearing was held with no testimony presented. <br /> Councilman McDonald wondered why a paving overlay was being applied to Garfield. His thinking <br /> was that the street was in good shape compared to?the~s needing repair. " Public Works Director <br /> explained various 'projects were being undertaken on a four-year program under the recently- <br /> approved bond issue. He noted that Garfield car~ies a heavy tr.affic l?ad pet~een 6th and 7th <br /> and some breaking up has been noted. Mciyor AnderElon felt 'judgment 011 project priority would <br /> have to be left to the 'engineering department, . . . ".,., <br /> In response to questions from Councilman Murray, Public Works Director explained the distinction <br /> between jobs done by the City crews and those contracted. He said the nature of the work, <br /> rather than size, determines whether City cr~ws d~'the' work~ An effort ~~ made to keep them on <br /> small patch jobs which cannot be contracted. The Director referred to the recommendation to <br /> reject bids received on the 15th Avenue sidewalk and said it may be n~Qessa~yto investigate <br /> possibility of construction by City crews since it had not been possible to get the property <br /> owner to install the walk, and on this attempt to initiate by petition, bid prices were un- <br /> reasonable. <br /> On questioning from Councilman Hershner with regard to bike paths on school property, Public <br /> Works Director said they were part of the program approved by the Bicycle Committee, these two <br /> built entirely on school' properties jointly used with the Parks Department a~d ~aintained by <br />tf' the City. Manager explained 'construction in this case is on priority recommended by the <br /> Bicycle Committee.' The City had funds budgeted, the School District did not, and since the <br /> facilities serve the same people bids were received on that basis. Joint Parks/School develop- <br /> ment has been a negotiated type program. Public Works Director added on further questioning <br /> from Councllman Her.shner that funds for the construction would be carried over to the 1973-74 <br /> budget from 1972-73 in a supplemental budget. <br /> I Councilman McDonald expressed concern about the City's being responsible for future maintenance <br /> of the bike paths. Manager said staff could discuss that with the School District if Council <br /> desires. <br /> Councilman Hershner asked for an explanation of "slurry seal." Public Works Director said it <br /> is a patented process wherein aggregate and asphalt are mixed and spread, sealing and restoring <br /> the paving surface. <br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to award contracts to the low bidder on <br /> each project, except that the award on paving, walks and sewers in 2nd Addition Shasta <br /> Gardens would be subject to review of financial condition of the developer, qnd the <br /> bids rejected on 15th Avenue sidewalk between Washington and Jefferson. Rollcall vote. <br /> Motion carried, all councilmen present voting aye. <br />"-=-l'.. 2. Irrigation and Landscaping, Amazon Village - Opened June 27, 1973 (Parks) <br />'. Includes area south of playground, east of slough, north of 24th Avenue, and west <br /> of Hilyard Street, and completes the area around the new Center. Subcon:tractors <br /> are shown in parentheses. <br /> Reed and Cross (Ramsey-Waite, Otto Jensen) $ 53,827.00 <br /> Lane County Nursery 57,378.00 <br /> Fairway Irrigation (Olympic Landscape) 59,827.00 <br /> Turf Irrigation (Marvin's Landscaping) 67,250.00 <br /> Cascadian Landscapers, Inc. 69,0110.00 <br /> Allen's Landscaping 78,578.00 <br /> Landscape Services, Inc. 2--&.3 85,880.00 7/9/73 - 7 <br />