|
<br />Parks Department estimate - $54,838.00.
<br />
<br />Award to Reed and Cross on the low bid price was recommended.
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. McDonald to award the contract to Reed and ~'-
<br />Cross as recommended. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all councilmen present ~
<br />voting aye.
<br />
<br />
<br />I 3. City Hall Basement Remodeling, Electrical and Mechanical Systems - Opened June 19,,1973
<br />
<br />l Bid Alternate
<br />Hamilton Electric $ 9,835.00 $ 9,835.00
<br />- 117.00 water cooling
<br />$ 9,718.00
<br />
<br />Mulheim Electric 10,500.00 $10,500.00
<br />- 129.00 water cooling
<br />$10,371. 00
<br />
<br />Chase Company 18,245.00 $18,245.00
<br />" -,. ,,:.-6,359.00,water. cooling
<br />'., '- $11,886.00,
<br />. . -.
<br />
<br />Manager reviewed bids and recommended award to I:Iamilton Electric and Ch~se Company on .
<br />the basis of consultation with Marquess and; Marqu'ess who assisted in 'deveio"ping 'specifica.-. ,6.'
<br />tions for the mechanical system. ..,
<br />.. . "
<br />
<br />Mr.' Williams mov~d se'conded by Mr. Herhsner to award contrC).cts as recomm~nded,.
<br />.. .' , .". . ,-' , " - --' " . (.... - . "'(
<br />
<br />On quest ion fr'om Coun'cilman McDonald, MaIlagyr 'explained that the. remodeling is to provide
<br />office space in the basement below the parking a~ea wh~ch .is n9w used,f~r.a pOlice train-
<br />ing room. It will not interfere with any future building bf a'tower on the north side of
<br />the building. .
<br />
<br />- .. .,- " . , .. , I _' _'
<br />_ Council~an Williams' questioned the. one-t'htrd,d;iffere,ntia,t f~r w~t,er,c,ool,ing and wo};tciered
<br />whether there wCl.~ anyanalysiswitp~egCl.rd.tp that ,$ystem versu9,C).ir cooling." Assistant
<br />Manager answ~r th~~ ~here wa~ no investigation of an air cooling.system since the installa-
<br />tion 'is an a~dition t<;>' the ex~sting sY;3tel1l. " :. 'J
<br />
<br />, . ,-. ..... ' , .. , -- -
<br />Rollcail'vote 'was taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried, all council-
<br />men present voting aye.
<br />
<br />III - Cor;tsent Calendar ",' , . '" J', ... a
<br />Items acted upon with one motion. Discussed previously in ,c.ommittee,meetings on
<br />June 27, 1973 (Preseilt: Mayor Anderson; Councilmen Beal, Williams, Hershner, Campbell,
<br />Murray, and ,i'food) and em JuJ"y 3, 1973,'CPresen;t: ,Mayor AndersoI'J.; CQuncilmen B,eal', McDonald, .
<br />Hersh~~r, Campbel;L" ,t1uy>ray" and Wood).:. " , " ' . "...., '"
<br />
<br />A. Day Island' RdadLOcatIo-n;i;]t~~"B~ker"p~rk -'pTannTngO Commission 'June 12--;1973 recom":,
<br />mended modification of conditional use contract between the City and County to
<br />accommodate relocation of Day Island Road to the south so as to pass under the I-5
<br />bridge over the Willamette River, thereby allowing waterway construction in the
<br />present underpass. The Commission stressed that this recommendation in no way con-
<br />stitutes its approval of the overall plan for Alton Baker Park nor of intrusion of
<br />parking areas into the natural area east of I-5. Further consideration of the re-
<br />lationship between the roadway and pedestrian/bike trail at the new underpass loca-
<br />tion was also recommended. planning Commission minutes were noted, indicating an
<br />estimated cost of $38,000 for relocation of the road as recommended compared to
<br />$265,000 to expand the present underpass to accommodate both the ,roadway and water-
<br />way. It was understood the current need for the roadway is primarily to serve the
<br />sanitary land fill in that area, and that there is no commitment in moving the road
<br />that would require its being a permanent installation, although it is recognized
<br />access to the Park should be available from the east for autos as well as pedestrians
<br />land bikes.
<br />
<br />'Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to authorize staff to modify conditional
<br />;u~e permit ~o allow relocatio~ ~f Day Is~an~ Road next t~ the River with adjacent iii
<br />'b~ke path w~th the clear prov~s~on that ~t ~s not a comm~tment to permanent'"
<br />existence of the road in that location.
<br />
<br />In answer to Councilman Murray, Mr. Williams said the motion would include also the
<br />stipulation that approval of relocation would not constitute approval of the over-
<br />all plan for the Park and that further consideration would be given relationship
<br />[between the road and pedestrian/bike trai~ at the new ~ocation.
<br />
<br />
<br />..~... 7/9/73 - 8
<br />
|