My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/27/1973 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1973
>
08/27/1973 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/24/2007 12:16:12 AM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:13:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/27/1973
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />In answer to Councilman Murray, Bob Thomas, ERA, said buildings scheduled for demoli- <br />tion would be down by next April; some will be down within a month. Council woman , <br /> , <br />Beal wondered if some expression should be received from the Sign Code Board of . '. <br />Appeals before Council action. Manager said there is no feeling at staff level <br />tha t the Board woul d not approve this request. The Board has another meeting <br />scheduled prior to the September 10 Council meeting at which time they could ex- <br />press themselves. Mrs. Beal suggested inviting Board members co the August 27 i <br />meeting so the Council would have their thinking as individuals. f <br /> I <br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to grant six-month extension for signs of i <br />tenants of Eugene Renewal Agency buildings scheduled for demolition in that period Comm <br />of time and invite comments of the Sign Code Board of Appeals to this action. 8/22/73 <br />Motion carried, all voting aye, except Mr. McDonald abstaining. Approve <br />Eric Larsen, 81 West 23rd Avenue, attorney representing Obie Communications, asked for <br />clarification of the action. He wondered if it meant a moratorium on enforcement,.of the <br />Sign Code as it would affect those buildings. He also asked by what authority those non- <br />conforming sighS would be retained. <br />Assistant Manager explainecl'thabthe:tentative action of the Council was to grant a six-month <br />extension-for signs on those buildings owned by the Renewal Agency and scheduled for demolition <br />within the next six months. The basis for the recommendation leading to that Council action <br />was the alternative of removing non-confomring signs leaving tenants with no identification <br />or undue financial hardship in obtaining new signs for the six-month period. The extension . <br />was intended to apply only for tenants of ERA buildings scheduled for demOlition, not for <br />those with a longer term of occupancy. Assistant Manager added that the authority for the ,,' <br />extension rests with the Council. In answer to Mr. Larsen's inquiry whether the discussion <br />was with regard to overall issue of non-conforming signs, Assistant Manager answered that it <br />was limited exclusively to the extension for signs on ERA buildings which are to be torn down. <br />He said the matter of any delay ih the deadline for conformance to the Sign Code will be be- <br />fore the Council prior to the September 10 meeting. He noted the Council was advised of the <br />August 28 meeting with regard to the Sign Code scheduled by a group of businessmen and said <br />there. would be Council and staff representation at that meeting. <br />J.Petition, Sanitary Sewer - From 28th Place south between Lots 6 and 7,q"Biock 3, <br />9th Addition to Ellendale (IOO%). The line will serve a planned unit development <br />off Chambers and 28th. <br />:Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to accept the petition. Motion carried Comm <br />,unanimously. 8/22/73 <br /> Approve <br />K. Communication from Active Bethel Citizens - Requesting Council consideration of <br />'amending the assessment procedure for street improvements. Also, encouraging <br />; immediate establishment of the low-income assessment payment deferral system with <br />,non-interest bearing provisions, and that Barger Drive improvement in 1974 be -. <br />continued to the west City limit. <br />Manager noted that the group is also concerned about the possibility of varying <br />:assessments for street improvements depending upon degree of land development. Staff' <br />is working on the low-income assessment payment deferral policy and will bring a : <br />'recommenation to the Council. Wi th regard to the Barger Dri ve improvement, Manager : <br />said Barger Drive is the City limit on the western extension and the City has no , <br />,authority tc: asse~s thiiF portion Tying in the County for any improvement. Staff -.- <br />recommendat~ons w~ll be prepared on all three questions. <br />Councilman Murray asked postponement of discussion to accommodate those peopl h <br />.drafted the letter and wished to be present when it was considered Ma e w. 0 <br />t d" .. . nager sug- <br />ges.e ~nqu~ry to deternune whether the letter, signed by the Traffic Subcommittee <br />.cha.~rma.n, had been cleared through the parent Active Bethel Citizens organization. Comm <br />Mrs. .Beal moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to receive the letter and place on file 8/22/73 <br />pend~ng staff review and discussion at a later time. Motion carried unanimously. Approve <br />L.IAbatement, 2375 Madison Street - Recommended by Building Depart t' . <br />, d . '. men ~n memo prev~ousl y, <br />~str~buted to Counc~l members. Manager explained a number of commi tments have been .' <br />: made by the property owner but work has not been done. Council will have opportuni ty <br />to see the property on tour prior to the public hearing. <br />, Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Wood to call public hearing on the abatement. '.Comm <br />'Motion carried unanimously. 8/22/73 <br /> . .1!pprove <br /> 2. 71 <br /> 8/27/73 - 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.