|
<br />>
<br />
<br />, ~ ...._:...;;:::::.__..::-..._.. ,,;'~.__'__-~-:::_ "_" ___,.._____.....;.....~..__....-.._.._____________u_________________.. 'H._..._.________________ p..________.u ______._ .
<br />
<br />F!.N ITAtct Sf \...'~ R:
<br />'Z:--.,...il:--:..-;~~~L:-rl:0t:1 projc..:u:d 3a,h ^vunll~l to
<br />H..a (to ~!)Ulh of '.)('u A'/:J.. .un..! fro::1
<br />1uO it. ,...p.l of Ihr.c Anu:J:(,n DrJv(: ro thu
<br />Lo'.t. :L'Jt. (4.'1,:', ,ad llha!j~ (7~2)
<br />
<br />
<br />I !;hc:-:/a'j C()nt(i:.(:turti~ 1nc...............$ 52.1tlj.HO...........................L~lt.....$ 0.01/<;4. ft...................O
<br />
<br />2.. f;11tlit;;t C:l:~~,t.ru..~tlo() Ct;rnflhnio...... I....~ 68,065.00 :h.n, , .. .$27. 7.~ ",Ich.
<br />J.<:vy....~ 0.0'-15/"'1.11.
<br />
<br />
<br />COHl'LETION DATE: A';1"~II~t! J 1'.~i:t ~..
<br />
<br />
<br />'" C..mtr:tct Cost CI)~t t.; C~:y ..
<br />.,~:'~_.~,~..~~!~~:_.~~!r?!:.~.~._____~___. _____._.______~~.._._.__ __._.__. ~ _
<br />
<br />.j+.:.r.::;lit~l.:;n & .itci.' Clcncnnce:
<br />2:.filJ Ch..~ll;t..(:ru 5t:t'cct
<br />
<br />1. :: G. '.4 ~;.Jlt.i;'n, Hruckcrti........ ...... ... ........ ,$ )66.00..,.... .................. ..... ... ........................ .$](){,.OO
<br />2. Joh(&f:nn a,.ol).........................~...........~ ~SO.O~
<br />'j. J,~y r. 01.11h4S!lS.............,......................., v4U.O(J
<br />. I,. tU6~n<< BuLldLng ~frQck"r..,.......................$1,250.00 CUMl'LETIO:: DATE: Ih~\-:t.~mlH'r 151 19}]
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />Bids were reviewed by Public Works and the following recommendations made:
<br />1. Devereaux and Pratt, Proposal No. 2
<br />2. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc., Alternate
<br />3. Shur- Way Contractors', Inc.'
<br />4. Shur-Way Contractors, Inc., subject to agreement between Hirons and City that
<br />he will pay for that portion of his property located outside the City.
<br />5. M & W Building Wreckers
<br />
<br />Manager stated No. 4 and 5' are formal public hearings because of assessment costs.
<br />
<br />Public hearing was held with no t,estimony presented. I
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to award as recommended, with the stipulation .~
<br />on No. 4 that agreement be made between Hirons and. the City rather than asking for a ~
<br />deferred assessment. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all councilmen present voting aye.
<br />
<br />II '-Consent Calendar
<br />Items acted upon with one motion after discussion of individual items if requested.
<br />Previously discussed at committee-of-the-whole meetings on October 24 (Present:
<br />Mayor Anderson; Council persons Beal, Williams, McDonald, Hershner, Campbell, Murray,
<br />and Wood) and October 31 (Present: Mayor Anderson; Council members Beal, Williams,
<br />Hershner, Campbell, Murray, and Wood). Minutes-of those meetings appear below printed
<br />in italics. __ _ ~ _ _c . __ ____ ___
<br />
<br />A. Hiring Pro Tem Judges - Council was asked for authorization to hire pro tem
<br />judges to conduct night courts because of the backlog of cases to be tried.
<br />Funds to cover the expense are included in the budget.
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Wood to authorize the hiring of protem ,cofnm
<br />judges as requested. Motion carried unanimously. 10/24/73
<br />~. :.. APP~CJ3e
<br />
<br />-- --. -',
<br />~.- '="c___ -_.._____ _.____.__
<br />
<br />B. Study of Zoning in Goodpasture Island Area - A two-pafle resolution, which was
<br />prepared for Council review, was distributed with the idea that it could be .'
<br />i given possible consideration at the next regular Council meeting. Councilwoman' . '
<br />! Beal felt it was a fine, complete definition of items pertinent to the ~tudy.
<br />I She particularly favored the stipulations that no further rezoning applications
<br />be considered in the Goodpasture Island area until completion of the study.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal moved .seconded by Mr. Murray to approve the resolution. Corom
<br />. 10/31/73
<br />I ,
<br />j Councilman Murray then suggested some additions to the proposed resolution. Appro~e
<br />; To the statement reading, "That the study establish criteria for determining (See eouinc.l
<br />what constitutes large-scale regional use," he suggested adding, "and how actio'n
<br />i extensive are the needs for such development". He suggested adding a new below')
<br />I provision immediately after that which would read,."That the study consider the
<br />. .
<br />!. possibility of using other opportunity areas for part all of any needed
<br />, large-scale regional development". Mayor Anderson pointed out his desire to
<br />keep the focus of the study confined to the Goodpasture Island and downtown areas.
<br />Councilman Murray pointed out that determining there are large-scale needs does
<br />not necessarily answer the question as to where those needs would best be met.
<br />He felt it, essential to know if there are other opportunity areas. Mayor
<br />Anderson felt this would be pointed out in the study. Councilwoman Beal stated
<br />I that one of the essential ingredients of a study is the inclusion of alternatives.
<br />Councilman Murray suggested another additional point be made after the existing , ...
<br />I No.5, which would read, "That, if the study reaffirms the existence of excessive .
<br />commercial zoning, it recommend means to reduce the amount and intensity of
<br />such zoning". Mayor AndE!rson reiterated his concern with taking the study
<br />I outside the project area. Councilman Murray felt that an evaluation of needs in
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />11/,5/73 - 6
<br />'. .~-_. ..
<br />
<br />333
<br />
|