|
<br />.'
<br />
<br />J. Improvement Peti tions
<br />1. Paving, sanitary and storm sewers within Mistletoe Subdivision
<br />'2.. Storm 'sewer between Willakenzie and Cal Young from east side of Coburg Road to
<br />the east
<br />Both were petitioned by owners of 100% of property to be assessed. City cost on
<br />the,Willakenzie storm sewer was estimated at $2,300.
<br />
<br />i~~.
<br />
<br />Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to approve the petitions.
<br />!~, unaniJTK)usl y .
<br />\,.....~_.,----.................. - - '"~-~--'--_._.,- ..-.-. --- -. - -:-----.---------.- -
<br />
<br />Corrun
<br />2/6/74
<br />carried Afprove
<br />
<br />Motion
<br />
<br />,-_..__._.'_....._~-:-.~- -".-
<br />
<br />.- --.-,'--.-__._..1
<br />
<br />K.~~dinancere: Council Meetings - Would provide for official meetings to replace
<br />!those displaced by holidays, delineate between adjourned and regular meetings,
<br />I " '
<br />: and forego the necessi ty of Council rescheduling meetings when they .fall on a
<br />: holiday.
<br />
<br />,It was understood the ordinance would be placed on the consent calendar for
<br />at the February 11 Council meeting.
<br />
<br />Corrun
<br />'?/6/74
<br />Approve
<br />approval 1
<br />
<br />L.;Ordinance re: Gambling, lotteries, punchboards - Would repeal sections in the City
<br />: Code which have been superceded by State law. Recommended by City Attorney. It
<br />was understood the ordinance would be placed on the consent calendar for approv,al
<br />at the February 11 Council meeting.
<br />
<br />\
<br />icomm
<br />2/'6/74
<br />Approve
<br />I
<br />i
<br />
<br />~
<br />
<br />M. RMB License Application - Brass Rail, 1143 Oak Street (New outlet) - OLCC report
<br />,indicated several contacted in the neighborhood objected to the location. Staff
<br />suggested public hearing.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />[Mrs. Bea1 moved seconded by Mr. Wood to schedule public hearing on the application
<br />,.
<br />rfor February 25 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimoUSly.
<br />
<br />!Corrun
<br />2/j6/74
<br />App{OVe
<br />
<br />,
<br />
<br />I
<br />I .
<br />N.IGoodpasture Island Plann~ng Contract - Proposed contract was presented between the'
<br />:City and Livingston and Blayney, San Francisco planning consultants, to cover study
<br />'of co~ercia1 needs in the Goodpasture Island area in accordance with Council resolu-
<br />tion and subsequent discussions ,.between staff and the consul tant. Manager explained
<br />that, the contract spelled out a series,of work programs at a maximum cost of $65,000.
<br />Depending upon the conclusions from data analyses with regard to the amount of staff
<br />,time apd material which can be provided by the City, if further fol1owup of recdrrunenda-,
<br />~tions is found unnecessary, a portion of the contract c;ou1d be eliminated thereby"
<br />,reducing the cost. Should changes to the General Plan be recommended, further steps
<br />'lwou1d be necessary. Manager felt the proposed contract appropriate for the study
<br />;,desired.
<br />
<br />,
<br />i'
<br />
<br />.r
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />""."" ~!>""~ ".-'.~. . ' '}
<br />:P1anning Director added that because of the time element only one midpoint public
<br />ireview would be possible. Livingston & Blaynet, he said, have employed the economic
<br />I
<br />[consulting firm of Lloyd LeBlanc & Co. who are familiar with economic conditions in
<br />I'the Willamette Valley area. A recorrunendation at the midway point has also been' re-
<br />:quested with regard to whether annexation of the entire Island area should occur
<br />rimmediately. The contract also provides for 'expansion of the consultant's services
<br />!ShOU1d the city of Springfield want additional information. He explained time and
<br />,materials, billing, and itemization details of the contract and said completion of
<br />~the study is anticipated for presentation to the Council the latter part of June.
<br />-q
<br />In answer to Mrs.Beal, Planning Director said the cost of the South Hills study
<br />accomplished by planning staff was estimated at $25,000 plus some benefits received
<br />from other City departments and other agenci.es'. He said the Goodpasture Island study ,
<br />dealth with complex economic situations between the downtown area and Valley River
<br />i. and was not comparable to the South Hills study.
<br />I
<br />
<br />- --: .? -~ .
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Manager explained that staff proceeded on the assumption tentative Council approval
<br />was g~ven when previous report' on the direction taken was given. At that time an
<br />. estimated cost of $45,000 to $70,000 was given. It was also noted at that time that
<br />, the expertise necessary for the type of study desired was not available at the staff
<br />: level. He said copies of the contract would be distributed to Council members prior
<br />; to the February 11 meeting and the City Attorney also would have an opportunity for
<br />,review. In answer to Mrs. Beal, Manager said the study would not define urban service
<br />'boundaries in the Goodpasture area; it is already completely surrounded by the City.
<br />
<br />:rt was understood the contract wolild be an item for
<br />at the February 11 meeting and that Council members
<br />contract for revi.ew 1;>.efore that time.
<br />
<br />',Comm
<br />
<br />approval on the consent calendar 2/6/74
<br />would recei ve copies of the Ap.prove
<br />I
<br />I
<br />.J
<br />
<br />. -'~----'----+---
<br />
<br />50
<br />
<br />2/11/74 - 11
<br />
|