Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />'. <br /> <br />\ <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />, 0895 <br /> <br />0926 <br /> <br />0939 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />R.iParking Violations, 14th and Hilyard - Councilwoman Campbell reported complaints <br />., received about parking on the sidewalk and on a vacant lot on 14th Avenue between <br />Hilyard and the University campus which forced pedestrians to walk in the'street. <br />It was understood staff would investigate the violations and return a report to <br />the Council. <br /> <br />Comm <br />2/6/74 <br />Affirm <br /> <br />"~,,,'~-'~ --.-.--.- -.-.........---------__~~......_.....:___,_._,__......J <br />. , <br /> <br />S. Representation, LCOG - Mayor Anderson said he would like to relinquish his posi- <br />tion on the board df directors of Lane Council of Governments. He asked the <br />, Council to consider pppointment of a replacement.. <br /> <br />Comm <br />:1/30/74 <br />~; File <br /> <br />-. .... ----.---,..-.--.,..-'.-.---. -- ... '.--- ._-~-_.._-_..., . -.,. ~'. ~.~ '~-"" --~_.- -.. .~.... '..-.,<-. ... -,..._' . .~..~- <br /> <br />i <br />-'-.,_.-1 <br /> <br />:Possible review of the Teleprompter franchise was suggested prior to its expiration <br />date of 1980. Mrs. Campbell asked that a copy of the opinion be sent to George Kaufman <br />in the Business School at the Unive~~ity. He raised the question initially and <br />, Mrs. Campbell felt he would indicate whether the matter should be pursued. . <br /> <br />Manager said consideration is to be given to the cable television industry and its <br />availability for public purposes since some Federal positions on what can be done <br />with television will require discussion of arrangements with the cable television <br />industry prior to 1980. Considerable support will be provided for use of cable <br />teevee by the pUblic through negotiation with the company which is not now provided <br />, under franchise rights. <br /> <br />I Councilman Wood wondered whether extension of existing cable service was covered by <br />\ franchise. He wondered if there were restrictions on~capital construction or time. <br />: limits on providing service after an application was received. City Attorney answered i <br />: that the franchise was essentially a permit to carryon business. The company does <br />:not have any obligation other than its own business interests and trying to perform <br />fan adequate service. Manager added that the franchise provides that they "must pro- <br />I vide service where economincallZ; feasible." <br /> <br />\ No action was taken.. <br /> <br />'Comm <br />2/6/74 <br />...---..-.......----' File <br /> <br />U.NLC congr'"essional/City Conference, Washington, D.C., March 3":'5' - Notice of the <br />;conference was brought to the Council's attention with request that those wishing <br />to attend notify the Manager's office. Manager said this year's conference appeared <br />.to concentrate on community development, block grant legiSlation, energy conservation, <br />[Congressional reorganization, transportation. He added that an effqrt is usually Comm <br />;made at the winter session to brihg local officials into contact with Congressmen 2/r~74 <br />I' ~~__ Was~~ngton . .. '....u., _....JF ~l e <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to approve, affirm~ and file as not:d Items A <br />through U as noted. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all councllmen present votlng;~ye, <br />except Councilman Murray voting no on Item G - Referral of Highway 126 project to LCOG. <br /> <br />III - <br /> <br />Authorization Convey to Paul Hansen land south of Jacobs Drive, west of <br />Small trianguiar piece of land left over from platting subdivision, sold <br />at appraised price. <br /> <br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to authorize deed for the <br />property. Rollcall vote. Motion carried, all councilmen present voting aye. <br /> <br />Fairfield <br />to Paul Hansen <br /> <br />IV - Ordinances <br />Council Bill No. 437 - Adding Section 4.030 and amending Section 4.890 of City Code <br />re: Prohibited Weapons was submitted and read the first time <br />on January 28, 1974 and held over to this date,now brought back and read the second <br />time by council bill number and title only, there being no councilman present re- <br />questing that it be read in full. <br /> <br />City Attorney advised there was some question about compatibility of this ordinance with <br />State law. Recommendation was to delay to give Attorney opportunity for further work <br />on it. It was understood the ordinance would be held over. <br /> <br />51 <br /> <br />2/11/74 .:.. 13 <br />