|
<br />.~
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />e
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />
<br />Vote was taken on the motion to recommend approval. Motion carried, all::present
<br />voting aye, except Mrs. Beal and Mr. Keller not present.
<br />
<br />D.
<br />
<br />Street Name
<br />,october 26,
<br />\A venue, and
<br />
<br />Change, LOrna.' Linda La.ne"- PlannJ.ngCommission recommended 01'l
<br />1970 change of name for streets formerly known as 33rd Avenue,
<br />Lama Linda Drive south of Crest Drive to "Lama Linda Lane."
<br />
<br />34t;h
<br />
<br />, Mr. Williams mov~d seconded by Mr. Wood to schedule public hea;rwg
<br />f..:.,," ."...9T}." t.?2~,pa!!'.~__qf1all~,.-,,-.~~E,=!:9..!l_.,?aE.!i. ed ,.' u~aI:!~IlIOusl y.
<br />
<br />-'
<br />
<br />Comm
<br />5/15/74
<br />Pub Hrng
<br />
<br />Recommended by the Planning Commission to rename portion of 33rd, 34th, and Loma Linda
<br />Drive to Lorna Linda Lane.
<br />
<br />Public Hearing was held with no testimony presented.
<br />
<br />Council Bill No. 547 - Naming portion ,of 33rd, 34th, and Loma Linda Drive south
<br />of Crest Drive "Loma Linda Lane" was read by number and
<br />,title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in
<br />full.
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be read the second time
<br />by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the. Council, and that. enact-
<br />ment be considered at this time. Motion carried u:ganimQ us ly; and" the bill was read the
<br />second., time by council bill'-nUmber only.
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the council bill be approved and'
<br />given final passage. ,Rollcall vote. All Councilmembe~s present voting aye, except
<br />Mrs. Beal and Mr. Keller who were not present, the bill was declared passed and
<br />numb'ered 17071.
<br />
<br />E. Cocle A~eridments
<br />'1:lQrdinancEl,; Felling and.-Removal' of Trees ''';''Copies of proposed6rdinance with letter
<br />:of'transmitt~ were previously distributed to Council. Councilman Wood, chairman
<br />!of the subcommittee charged with preparation of the ordinance, explained its provi-
<br />'sions. He said it would cover primarily undeveloped'property and trees farther than
<br />;100 feet from a building. It would not prevent; cutting of trees. but was meant to
<br />!prevent mismanagement of undeveloped land through indiscriminate remd'J~~~qf any vege-
<br />:tation contributing to environmental qua'lJ..ty~. It requires a permitbaliid.' on ;reason-
<br />:~ble guidelines and provides an appeal p;:'d~edure' in the event of. deni.~1::1~t.::permit.
<br />!Appeals would be heard by athree-membercorrimittee comp:r;ising one person chosen by
<br />: appellant, one chosen by pa.rk department, and a third chosen by the other two, none'
<br />ito be members of the parks department itself. In case of disagreement on the third
<br />Imember, the municipal judge would appoint the third member. The tree commi tt$e'
<br />:recommended that the conqern with cutting of single trees on developed property be
<br />laddressed by the parks department through an educational program. ~lso, .~haf the
<br />icommi ttee continue to function, working wi th the.parks department, to assess the
<br />:conce.rns on street trees and bring back proposarfor changes that might be beneficial.
<br />
<br />Mr. Wood moved seconded by Mr. Williams to adopt the ordinance and schedule
<br />public' hearing, direct the parks department to initiate an educational pro-
<br />gram with regard to single trees on developed property, continue the subcom-
<br />mittee to work with the parks department '.in reviewing the street tree ordinance
<br />and consider.any Changes which might be of belle fit, and forward th~ ordinance
<br />to the Planning Commission for considerationo~ criteria in deliberations on C m
<br />PUDs and standarq s::bdivisions.' .' ~/f' 4
<br />; , . '.::,: "BtibS ,jH&g
<br />iCouncilwoman Campbell commented,on,-removal of treesfro.m public rights-of-way by ,~,-'~ .
<br />'ci ty crews wi thout notice to people in the area . 'She. wondered whether there' was someJ
<br />:provision for notice in the event of such action.' Ed'Smi th, parks director, said I
<br />:that would be a part of the proposed educational'program, making people aware of the
<br />;co-operative basis on which trees would be handled. He saw no need to spell out'
<br />:in. the ordinance a provision covering that aspect.
<br />
<br />:Edna Shirey, member of the ci ti zens commi ttee working wi th the COuncil subcommi t;tee,
<br />:commented on the strong feeling in the committee that something should be done with
<br />iregard to educating the public and the need to cataJog trees of special interest to
<br />j1;h'ecity. .. . .
<br />r .' " ~. .'"
<br />(councilman McDonald noted his intention of abstaining from the vote. He referred to
<br />Jhis personal interest in a small lot anq his uncertainty about how this ordinance
<br />1would affect removal of trees there in the ev~rit he wanted' to build.
<br />
<br />,
<br />~..--
<br />
<br />'"
<br />
<br />~-""'....._~., -
<br />
<br />. "-~--"--~-"--'
<br />
<br />_k_.,,-,- __________
<br />
<br />. ~:.~...:.,.- '-"'."'-' -- . --.- ---'-
<br />
<br />5/20/74 - 9
<br />
<br />.1~1
<br />
|