|
<br />'...,.......-..... .. .-.,-,...........
<br />. _....4_.. ._.. _ _,_,'~'''._ _~"'.'_'''_' ...,.,',.,.._.,.~._.. '~'.,"_'''''''-__ .'".~......__, _~....... __. "..... ... ,..,,,,., ' . ...._ _ .
<br />D. ,Street Name Change, Hawkins Heights Boulevard - Planning Commission on April 22
<br />recommended renaming Hawkins Heights Boulevard to Hawkins Lane, and east/west
<br />portion of Hawkins Heights Boulevard at Broadview Street, to South Lambert.
<br />
<br />Mr. Wood moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to schedule public hearing
<br />,on the name change. Motion oarried unanimously.
<br />
<br />comm
<br />: 5/29/74
<br />Pub Hrng
<br />
<br />Puhlichearing Wg.s opened.
<br />
<br />11:r?s-. 'Roo.ert f!iller,287Cl Hawkins: Lane,' s'aia she represented several residents living
<br />on' Hawkins' Lane ,. and Hawkins" Heights Boulevard all desiring the Jiame "Hawkins, Lane"
<br />~o~ the entire Street. '
<br />
<br />No fur~her testimony was presented, and public hearing was closed.
<br />
<br />Council Bill No. 575 - Renaming Hawkins Heights Boulevard "Hawkins Lane" and
<br />east/west portion'ofHawkins Heights Boulevard between
<br />Broadview and South Lambert "South Lambert" was read by council bill number and
<br />title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be read in full.
<br />
<br />Mr. ~ill~ams moved seconde~ by Mr. Hershner that'the bill be read the second time
<br />by coun~l.l b:111 nu~er :>nly, Wl. th unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment
<br />,b: consl.dered.at !hl.s tlme. Motion carried unanimously and the bill was read the seco d
<br />tlrne by councl.l bl.ll number only. n
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the council bill be approved and
<br />given ~inal passage. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, the
<br />bill was declared passed and numbered 17102.
<br />
<br />E.
<br />
<br />Zoning Newly Annexed Areas
<br />. . "'~. -. ....' _.' --~ -''';;:;; ..,.-,- ~.., -. ~?" .....------- .~.. ~
<br />'Planning COmInission ,Report - May 7, 1974
<br />'A. zoning newly annexed areas recommended
<br />1. Willagillespie-Russet Area - RA and C-l
<br />2. West end of Hunington Avenue west of Donald - R-l PD
<br />B. Sign District Boundary change recommended - north of River Avenue, south of
<br />Belt Line, and west of Ross Lane - From Residential District to Outlying Commercial,
<br />C. Recommended approval of open space land designation for assessment purposes -
<br />Nob Hill Homes Association, timbered property located along the south side
<br />of 30th Avenue east of Agate Street, with conditions.
<br />
<br />., ,'~".. .'
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Beal to schedule public hearing on the
<br />items for June lO Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously.
<br />
<br />comm
<br />6/5)74
<br />Pub Hrng
<br />
<br />i. Willagillespie-Russet Area - RA and c-1 (City)
<br />2. West end of Huntington Avenue west of McDonald - R-1 PD (City)
<br />
<br />Public Hearing was held, no testimony was presented.
<br />
<br />Council Bill No. 576 - Zoning newly annexed willagillespie-Russet area RA and c-1
<br />was read by title and number only, there being no councilman
<br />present requesting that it be read in full.
<br />
<br />:CouiiCIlmari'Williiims' wondered-whether 'i tw6Uldbe' proper '~to 'inClude fin~d:Lngs 'inst.aff
<br />botes and Commission minutes in the motion to approve when there appeared to be no
<br />~indings in those documents.
<br />"
<br />lJim Saul explained that the recommended zones were the same as the properties carried
<br />!in the County, and that the Commission had not hesitated to add the PD prefix to the
<br />,
<br />Hunington Avenue property. He said there was no major requiremeDt for positive findings
<br />~to support the recommended zones on either property. Stan Long, assistant city attorney,:
<br />..advised that the Planning Commission minutes could be incorporated into the, motion for
<br />whatever content they would contribute to support the zoning.
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner that the bill be read the second time
<br />by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council, and that enactment
<br />be considered at this time, and that the Planning Commission minutes dated May 7, 1974
<br />/; be incorporated as a part of the record to suppor't' the zoning.
<br />;..;"'"
<br />Councilman Herstlner wondered whether the c-1 ~oning recommended in the Willagillespie-
<br />Russet ar'ea was becau.se-6ftne' exlsting'small grocery store ,whether that zoning was
<br />desired there rather than designating,th~'store as a nonconforming use. He was not
<br />opposed to it, he said, but was wondering how the area would fit into the overall plan.
<br />Mr. Saul explained that there was commercial zoning ~till in the Countynext.to that
<br />particular piece of property. The occupant had plans to expand the stor,e whl.c~ would
<br />
<br />'ctS
<br />
<br />6/iO/74 - i4
<br />
<br />(i670)
<br />
<br />'.
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />( 1692 )
<br />
<br />-.
<br />
<br />r::- ~ .
<br />;tt. >,,-/
<br />. 'C'-
<br />~
<br />
<br />j
<br />
|