|
<br />, - - " -',' , ,~-- -- ....,..., 't':~;';-:;'~l" - -- . -- Al1loun t 'T-)
<br />-- ..- __.M , , ,:' -, . . Co~~ ~o ' Cost to cfty BudgotOQ 1
<br />iNa,,,, ur Biitder an,1 fr',)joct Contrpct Cost ,~buttwg Prop. ' I
<br />;~' .n.,~--":'-....,.__""""'_' .....--------~.~. \1
<br />
<br />(STO'''[ SEHER: I
<br />Ir.------!~ Oflkmont ,Jay flnd 01\!<way Torrace i
<br />;' [rOI1l Oa;MOY Ro~u to ~Y-De-Court (404) I
<br />
<br />" . -- 0... ............,............,.,...,...........$47,54Q.00
<br />l. 1. Dan "Haup eel' tractor. Inc.,......,......". ..$46.501. 70........,..................., , Engr: Eatimate
<br />
<br />~ ? Shur-Hay Cor,crac~ors, Inc.........,........,..$54.156.12 " _ "
<br />a. f' 3, KomWthR, ~.,"ti.ckConat.r\lc.tiOnco.mpony.......$68.291.~~ ' '.'.. __
<br />.. I" Rob€'rt L ~i('r,sen......,......,............'''' $77.706. (I
<br />~ j 5: W~ldish con~'tl'uctiop CO)1lpO!1Y.:..,.,..,,,...... $77 .805.00 COMPI,jtION P^T~~:' !<uguat 30. 1974
<br />
<br />L____._______,_________;._________________________.;..;.____---'-'--------~------'---'-~---""-"'_..-::-:'-:--~""-- - -. ~. ",'., '.' :;..:~-----------.--~---
<br />
<br />.' ....... .
<br />Don Allen, Public Works Director, review,ed.,bids. Award of contract to the:- low bidder on
<br />each project was recommended, except that no ~ecommenda~ion was, made on Item 3 - paving
<br />and sewers on Warren Street. Mr. Allen explained th.at a ,portion of the properties compri-
<br />sing the 51% on the petition for paving Warren Street were included in another contract.
<br />Also, that two parcels were yet. to be dedicated with the poss ibili ty condemnation might
<br />be necessary.
<br />
<br />_..-~.-
<br />-~-'::~.....;;:;.':'- -l'~-;::'~-J':-"-::'''';''e._~.~ ---.------ ..:. -=:'";..-'---'':;;7!-:;;:_~. --. .- -.," ~_,
<br />-._~P.':ili-lic-h~aringwa~,opened.... '-'.~._ . H_ _._
<br />
<br />..~ ~-4._w~
<br />
<br />
<br />RUby Burton, owner of property on Old Dillard Road, inquired about the cost of the project,
<br />noting two figures quoted. Mr. 'Allen answered that the estimated costs were $16.10 per
<br />-7 front foot for the section paved to 28.-foot width, $20.000 for the portion paved to 36-
<br />foot width. He estimated the 28.-footsect'ion would ,be about 212 feet and would be the
<br />Old Dillard Road portion bordered by the one property about which Ms. Burton was inquiring.
<br />Manager explained that the figures given were estimates only, that actual costs would not
<br />'. be known until completion of the project and figuring of costs on unit prices bid.
<br />
<br />Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell to award contracts to the. low
<br />bidders on each project.
<br />
<br />(1208.) Mr. Allen said recommendation was withheld on the paving and sewers on Warren Street
<br />because it was his understanding that the owners of the property needed for the right-of-
<br />way would be present to protest the project. Contract award was recommended to the low
<br />bidder, recognizing that the matter might be brought back to the Council with regard to
<br />the right-of-way problem. He explained that the Planning Commission had approved Phase
<br />~ 2 of the sUbdivision contingent upon paving this portion of the road.
<br />
<br />Councilman McDonald expressed concern because of possible future objection to the
<br />Warren Street proj ect and because of Director's reference to unbudgeted funds for
<br />Item 6 - Storm Sewer in Oakmont Way area. Manager explained that other, parties interested
<br />in the Warren Street project were aware that the contract award would be before the
<br />Coun~il at this meeting, and in view of their absence staff would make a firm recommenda~ion
<br />for award of the contract. With regard to the Oakmont Way storm sewer, Manager explained
<br />that it would be met from funds in the bond issue approved a couple of years back. The
<br />. fact that each project was not listed individually in the budget did not create a problem
<br />~- from the standpoint of funding, and the recommendation on this also was to award the
<br />contract.
<br />
<br />Rollcall vote was taken on the motion as stated, to award contract to the
<br />r), 'low bidder in each project. Motion carried, all council members voting aye,
<br />Mr. HBrshner not present.
<br />
<br />A short recess was taken.
<br />
<br />(1245) 2. July 8 opening
<br />t..... -_..~ "~._~__'h' ~ ~, c .. _.
<br />
<br />:!i',::' cffl BiddH 8!1rJ I'.,.oject '"-
<br />1--- ""7.~:~---"~-'-'--'--_. ---r----:;-r-r--
<br />t..~1Y~av ,~rojec_tJ:' u," _ Wild ish Copstruction Co. Eugene Sand & Gravel Benge Povin!\
<br />
<br />r n;.!';ard Ctrcer", Uth Ave.."' $13,400.00 $16.170.00 -
<br />It" 'o__Bror~~vay
<br />\ - .
<br />,S~ltY Way, G:llbl^ to_Norwood ~'3,347.00 . $3,850,00 $3.730.00 Over~I\Y Budget'- $:J.~O.OO(
<br />"
<br />1 Charn61ton. 5tr. t" Hh Ave. $ '5.:;70.00 $6.~liO,00 _
<br />
<br />I Lincoln St., 14!:h to 18th Ave. $ 9.300.00 $9.685.00 $10.823.00
<br />I ' . . .. , , ,
<br />
<br />4th Ave.. Cpal'!,dt:c1!1 1'0 1/~ $ 1.207.50 $1.750.00 -
<br />I ;l1(J,ck H,
<br />I
<br />. ! Clit.. \'iew. lAth If' gl~t f,vP. $ 7.190,00 $7.543,60 _
<br />
<br />\ .' I L";,~enca St" IllL to 19th Ava, $ '4,050,00 $4.233,00 $4.650.00 ,.
<br />I ,:j " . . ,:..". ' .' "
<br />.\JdqIC Street, :l(,rl. to 27tl\ I\V!" $ 2,175.00 $2.250.00 $2.344.50 :c.~
<br />L ''':". ;}t.
<br />\ Charnelton.,pt., Amazon Dr. to $ 4,505.00 $4,566.20 $5;083.00 I
<br />17th AVd,
<br />'__'-' __~__~____ ______~~_0--'.2':"_: 50 ______~_____ _ __Jli6, 8'U,,,:~~_ _________,.--=---__ ,__________ L__ _ __ .
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />7/8/74 - 5
<br />~ 2~b
<br />
|