|
<br /> .{
<br /> G~~~".~L~_~~~', a~_:,~_o-~~ct t.., .~ ......
<br /> f Wi1dish Constr.uction-Co. Benge ,Paving
<br /> i 0 ()yerlay 'yroi.~c t s_: Eugene Sand & Gravel
<br /> I ..""
<br /> ! High Street, 6th to 9th $ 9,98~.50 $ lO,050.00 -
<br /> -,
<br /> Elgh se,! 6th to C::-_e~hire $H,068.50 $ 11,400.00 .., .
<br /> ., th Place, Carfi ,,,1e: ~o Mcj{1!lley St. $16,464.00 $ 18,060,00 ~
<br /> City Vie", 14tb I:" 18th Ave., $10,160.00 $ 10,437.50 -
<br /> ,\.cthur St! t 18U'! cc g3rd f\.ve~ $14,+07,00 $ 14,800.00 $17,247,00
<br /> c.Oth Ave" Chan:c,lton ~o Jeffl'rsop . $ 8,502.00 $ 9,300.00 $10,858.00
<br /> :iayc!B St., 18th ~l) 22nd ^,venuc $ 6,210,00 $ 6,625';00 $ 7,875,00
<br /> I $' ~,124.00 $ 6,340.00 $ 7,591.00 .
<br /> i 1,:~lson St" 5th t.) 7th Ave.
<br /> \ 'f:, th Ave" City ':'Le" to lVi1son Ct. $ 5}050.70 $ 5,096.50 $ 5.823.30
<br /> L- $87,668.70 $ 92,109.00 -
<br /> ...
<br /> Rublic Works Director reviewed the bids on overlflY projects, explaining that bids were'----.:...____
<br /> t?ken on individual projects. Contract award was ,recommended to th~ ,low bjdder'on e~ch
<br /> ~ . ~ :,',-. ,
<br /> .....pt'oJect.
<br /> Public hearing was held with no testimony presented.
<br /> Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell to award contracts to__the, low bidder <-
<br /> on each project. Rollcall vote. All Council members present voting aye, Mr. Hershner
<br /> not present. . ,
<br /> D. Code Amendment - Deleting amount of Sign District Boundary Change ap~lication fee
<br /> (to be established by Council resolution)
<br /> Recommended by the Planning Commission on June 4, }974. Manager recommended holding the
<br /> bill after first reading until resolution setting the fee schedule, as well as the schedule
<br /> of fees for sign permits and appeals fDom Sign Code Board of Appeals, was ready for Council
<br /> action. That would be forthcoming upon completion of sub90mmi tte,e study on planning fees
<br /> .
<br /> now underway.
<br /> Public hearing was held with no testimony presented.
<br /> Council'Bill No. 602 - Amending Section 8.725(a)(c) and 8.804 (3) of City Code
<br /> and deleting Section 8.820(2) re: Permit .fees for .signs
<br /> and appeals on signs; and sign district boundary change was Dead by council bill
<br /> number and title only, there being no councilman present requesting that it be
<br /> read in full.
<br /> Mr. ,Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell that the, bill be held until resolution
<br /> setting fee schedule was ~eady for adoption.
<br /> In response to Councilman McDonald, Manager said three.different fees'.were involved and that ~.
<br /> a fee was required for signs if they required permit for installation.
<br /> Vote was taken on the motion to hold the bill. Motion carried unanimously:. Mr. Hershner
<br /> not present.
<br /> E. Class A Dispensers Liquor License --South Park Building, 855 Oak Street (13C:l;L ')
<br /> ...-..' - - .U'_ .____". __ ... . _ _ .
<br /> iSouth Park Building (no name for establishment), 855 Oak Street - Request
<br /> I from Wayne Henninger and Steven Nosler for Class A Dispensers license for
<br /> [new location when building completed. Comm
<br /> , 6/2\6/74
<br /> I Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Williams to set public hearing on Pub Hrng
<br /> I the application for July 8 Council meeting. Motion carried unanimously. I
<br /> ,
<br /> Requested by Wayne Henninger and Steven NosIer for an establishment in the building at
<br /> this location upon its completion. OLCC report of contact's 'in the area indicated one
<br /> objector, six not objecting. Staff saw no reason to recommend denial.
<br /> Public hearing was opened.
<br /> Dan Herbert, architect for the proposed building, spoke in favor of the request, noting '.
<br /> advantages of that type diversity in the building.
<br /> Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented.
<br /> Mr. Williams; moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell to recommend approval of the application.
<br /> Councilman Wood noted a number of recent applications recommended for approval by the
<br /> Council and denied by the.'OLCC on the basis that there were sufficient outlets in the area.
<br /> l 2.~1 7;P8/74 - 6 .~
<br />
|