|
<br /> K. 'Purchase Right-of-'Way, Bailey Lane Sidewalk - Authorization was requested to
<br /> iexercise option for purchase of right-of-way from Lois Greenwood, 66 Bailey Lane,
<br /> ; for $300.
<br />- Mr. Hershner moved seconded by Mr. Wood to purchase the property as Comm
<br /> i requested. Motion carried unanimously. 7/31/74
<br /> I ..-.' ... - .. '.""'Approve
<br /> . - ........ ~ - _. ...... "0_ .,._M_'" -
<br /> . -.--
<br /> -
<br /> L. :segrega~ion of A;sessment, Northwest corner 11th and Bertelsen - Requ~sted by ,
<br /> !M&H Investment Company -to segr.egate $5,566.42 of the assessment, leav~ng a \
<br /> : principal balance of $16,417016. Staff recommended app,roval. .\
<br /> . Comm
<br /> i I Wood to authorize the segregation.
<br /> ' i Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. 7/31/74
<br /> l
<br /> I Motion carried, all Counci];'members present voting aye, except . ...H Approve
<br /> Councilman Hershner abstaining. -- .----.. ~-------_. --
<br /> ---'.
<br /> .,.. '-'; ...... .. . - .~
<br /> .. -, . - . .'~
<br /> M. Assessment Panel Report August 5, 1974;
<br /> Manager explained that there were no protests and the recommendation was to levy
<br /> assessment as proposed in Council Bill No. 617, 618, 619, 620 (see under
<br /> ordinances). He read a letter received from Vernon A. Hoggott, Farlington, Approve
<br /> Kansas commentLng on the construction of 38th Avenue sewer at a time when costs
<br /> were so high.
<br />e N. Council minutes as circulated - April 22, May 20, June 10, 24, 26, July 8 Approve
<br /> Appointment, Metropolitan Area Planning Advisory Committee - Council was-
<br /> o.
<br /> I ' .
<br /> irequested to nominate a replacement for Alfred Tussing" resigned, on MAPAC
<br /> ifor the balance of the term ending June 30, 1975. LCOG submitted four names
<br /> Ifor consideration. It was suggested that the Council choose a replacement
<br /> ifrom'a list made up of the four names submitted by LCOG and the persons
<br /> ! filing for the last Planning Commission vacancy, plus up to two additional
<br /> I names submitted by each Council member who wished to do so. Mr. Williams
<br /> : thought because of'the time involved, each nominee considered should not
<br /> i be intervieweq. Councilman Wood sugges~ed that ~~uld give 'an advantage to
<br /> : those who had already been interviewed for ,the PLanning Cormnission position;
<br /> \.Mr. Murray thought the option ,would still be open to interview any of those
<br /> ! considered' for the position. Councilwoman Beal asked for a list of the
<br /> ipresent MAPAC members and their interests to give some idea of balancihg
<br /> out th.e membership. ,.
<br /> I
<br /> : Councilman Williams set a deadline of August 7, 1974 for submission of names Comm
<br /> I 7/24/74
<br /> i from Council members to be added to the four submi tted by, LCOG and the list
<br /> !of Planning Cormnission applicants, after which an executive session of the Affirm
<br /> Council wo,ul.d_ !?_~..,Ji,qIU~,dl.!J.(;!J,(L~o c/~loos.e the. replacement. ,.. I
<br /> "-
<br />e P. jSalvage Ordinance - Councilman Murray inquired about the st:atus of proposed
<br /> \ord4n~n.ce regulating salvage in demolition projects. Public Works Director
<br /> F~~liftf' said that inquiries had been mailed to other ci ties for examples of
<br /> rfhe type ordinance suggested but no replies had been received, to date. Comm
<br /> I '7/24/74
<br /> Q. ICbntrolling Length of Council Meetings - Copies of memo from Council presi- File
<br /> ident williams suggesting method for controlling length of Council meetings
<br /> lwere previously distributed to Cou~cil members. Mr. Williams said he was ;\
<br /> not partia:.uJarly in favor of adopti,ng a set policy, that he would rather
<br /> tsee careful preparation of agendas, limiting the number of items heard at
<br /> \ anyone meeting. j
<br /> I,
<br /> ,
<br /> (council~oman Beal agreed that it would be difficult to cut off a meeting 'I.
<br /> I
<br /> \
<br /> :at a given time, leaving people unheard who had been waiting all evening. 1
<br /> IShe suggested the possibili ty of attempting to dE!termine length of hearings,
<br /> inumber of people desiring to peheard, and then setting aside the Monday ,~
<br /> il
<br /> i.evening following the regular Council meeting for hearing when it was found '~
<br /> there would be too many at the regular time. \,~
<br /> Councilwoman Campbell thought it had been decided that Council decision was ~
<br /> "
<br />-- Inotnecessary at the same meeting at which an issue was heard, that delaying :i
<br /> a decision would be one way 'of shortening the length of meetings. i
<br /> I I
<br /> /councilman Wood discussed the possibility of limiting the length of hearing I
<br /> .;:-~
<br /> lo~ each subject, or limiting the tim~ for each s~eaker. . Advantages and I
<br /> .,
<br /> id~sadvantages of the several suggest~ons were we~lghed w~th consensus that "1
<br /> ! the present procedure of attempting to schedule hearings so that no one ,1 C
<br /> .~ OIDm
<br /> jagenda would be overloaded should continue. COU11Cil members present indi- 7/24/74
<br /> cated reluctant agreement to scheduling another meeting on the Monday I Fi-le
<br /> !
<br /> . following the regular meeting should' it become nc9cessary to accormnodate '~
<br /> : thofJe wishing to be heard. . ,__ r _. ~,- -- -,----.-.---.- ........~.~ .._.._-~. - , 8712/'i4-=-15--'
<br /> "-- .-~._\_~.~.,_.-._.~ --..-'+.............~-------_.~-_..__.._.'-- ~ -.
<br /> ?~A
<br />
|