|
<br />Manager revi~wed proposal for which monies were budgeted whereby assessments would be
<br />deferred and not collected by the city until property changed ownership or until the
<br />owner was in position to pay the assessment or no longer eligible for, hardship deferrment.
<br />Council previously received copies of'a study containing recommendations' which w.ould
<br />provide for deferral for people 62 years and older with household incomes less than $4000
<br />afo!, one person, $5~OO fo:- c: couple, ~lus $~OO for each additional dependent, and less than
<br />_ $2_0,_000 In assets In addItIon to theIr resIdence. Interest on the deferred amount would
<br />be charged at the rate of 3%. When the assessment became collectible, he said, it would
<br />be treated as a new assessment in terms of being eligible for Bancrofting (paying in
<br />installments) .
<br />
<br />(8766) Public hearing was held with no testimony presented.
<br />
<br />Council, Bill No. 646 - Amending City Code by adding Sections 7.190, 7.191,
<br />7.192, 7.,193, and 7.194 re: As'sessment Deferral in
<br />Hardship Cases was read by council bill number,and title only, there being'
<br />no councilman present requesting that it be read in full.
<br />-- I
<br />
<br />Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mrs. Campbell that the bill be read the second
<br />time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the Council and
<br />that enactment be considered at this time.
<br />
<br />Councilman Mc~onald -said he would vote against second reading, realizing it would hold
<br />passage until .the next ,Council meeting. He, wanted more information with regard to deferral
<br />eligibility and said he thought if there were only nine or ten instances where the ordi-
<br />nance would be applicable it might be "opening the door" . Councilman Murray expressed,
<br />~ surprise at Mr. McDonald's opposition when as a member of the 'suQcommittee with Council-
<br />., men Keller and Murray he had voted approval. Councilw.oman Campbell asked what property
<br />value would'be considered in determining eligibility. Manager an-swered that value of one's
<br />home would not be' a consideration, ,only that assets not exceed $20,000 in addition to the
<br />home. ,
<br />
<br />.
<br />
<br />Vote was taken on second reading. Lacking unanimous consent, Councilman McDonald
<br />voting no, the council bill was held over for second reading at the next Council
<br />meeting.
<br />
<br />D. Bids
<br />1. Public Works Department - Opened August 30 and September 4, 1974
<br />
<br />~-
<br />N f B' '_l ,~-' P . C t C Co~t to - .'.,"ount
<br />I am 0 ,,,.or n...j rOJect ontrac ost Ab\lttWg Prop. Cost to City Budgetod
<br />
<br />'ALLEY ?AVING:
<br />i 1-. Betl,een hillamette Street & Oak Street
<br />: from 13th to 14th (1086) .
<br />I
<br />1. l'iilcish Constnction Company...................$_10.757.00..:..............14' Alley Pay. $16.13/Fr.Ft..................0
<br />
<br />COMPLETION DATE: October 15. 1974
<br />.-----.----------------.-------------------------------_._---------_._-~------------------------------------------------------~----------------~-----------,
<br />: 2. East-,!est alley be tween 5th and 6th.
<br />Charnel ton St. to Olive St. (905)
<br />
<br />_ : i. flildish Ccnstruction Company...................$ 9.148.00..............................0...........................$ 9.148.00..........56.119.00
<br />
<br />I. COMPLETION DATE: O,:tober ,15. 1974
<br />.._~-_________________..________________________4_.__._______________.___________________..._____________________________~____________~____________________.
<br />iSAN lTAPY SEy.ER:
<br />3~:;t-7\Venue frcm approx. 1400 ft. West of
<br />i Seneca Road to 1200 ft. East (l001)
<br />i _
<br />1. Forrester ConstructionCompany.................$13.988.24.................San. Swr. Lat...$ O.056/Sq.Ft..-.............0
<br />2. Ivildish Construction Company...................$14,491.00
<br />I 3. Ivick Bros. Excavation..........................$lS,170.00
<br />, 4. Shur-h'ay Contractors, Inc......................$19.415.16
<br />: 5. l.G. Van Over Construction.....................$29.638.68 CO~iPlETION DATE: October 15'.1974
<br />. " '
<br />!~:--~~-~;;~;-~;;-~~~~-;;;:-~;;:-;;;:-~;;-~~~---------------------------------------------~" --_._-------------------------------~----_.__._._--_..~"-_._-'
<br />r 30th P,I/enue near Agate St. (1084) C't P t '
<br />. 1 Y roper Y
<br />1. Wi1dish Construction Company,..................$ 7,719.00.................San. Swr. Lat...S O.15S/Sq.Ft..........$ 2,200.00...~.........0
<br />i 2. L,D. Van Over Construct.ion.....................$ 8,699.20 (G 1f C )
<br />3. Shur-Ylay Contrilctors. Inc......:................$ 9.516.45 0 ourse
<br />
<br />, ,CO~IPLETlON DATE: October 15. 1974
<br />1_- ~,- -.. -- - - --... -,-.- -- --- - ~,,-~- - - ....- -- -..- - - -... -... - - -- - - - --... -... - -- - --- -... -- ---- .._____ -.--.....-...- -____...______ ~.-....."':.-<-,...,..._:- _...... .._~_.. __,-. ~.... "':._'" _ _~__ -.e- _ ~.~~.~...,,"'!. _~"'"-:-- _.~ _ _.... __.. _..... _ _ _ j
<br />!~. South of Storey Blvd., East of Frjend1y -
<br />,- 5trs2t; West of ~iew Lane (1085)
<br />
<br />I I. r;OI"" G:"2en Co Sons..............................$ 3.60S.95..................San. Swr, Lat...$ O.08S/Sq.Ft................0
<br />2. cCi"r(!ster Ccr.struction Cor.;pe.ny.....,...........$ 3.619.31
<br />I ,,',-!-:lj-sil Co"stnlctio~ CcTp2ny...................$ 4.865.50
<br />, .~ L.D. ':un Over' Construct;on.....................$ 4,993.08
<br />, :i. Sh;:r-',:,,>, Contr2ctors. 1nc......................$ 4,992.82 CQt.1PlETION DP,TE: October 15,1974
<br />
<br />J ~-...-.________..____...__...______..._________________________-...-.-----.....-..--......---....------------------.---.._____-----..------_~________...____________...____...___._
<br />.._ '(. Trunk s~\'er to sei'V2 the \':il1agil-lespie~
<br />. *- f:u5set a:.nexJtion area betl'ieen Goodpasture
<br />\ Isl.::.r:-:: .~C-ud 0:; N., ~:cr'kenzie Road on E.,
<br />, CSl:~t,,:, Ci"~ Road on S., Delta Hl!)n\1ilY
<br />c; II. (:,"8) BASIC ALTERNATE
<br />
<br />i. 51 ~,'-::a... Co~';>,a:tors. Inc....... ...$330,067.60... .$316.139.15............ .San. Swr. Lat...$ O.l1/Sq.Ft."........ ..$97,500.00...... .532,835.00.
<br />t. \-:;~jis~-CQ::-::-J:tion COr'1pany.......I\!c Bid.........$337.COl.24 Service.........$675.DO/Each .
<br />Ca!:i~~ Ditc~jr;...................S3S0,415.52.._..S365,2D8.29 _
<br />CO~IPlETION DATE: December 15. 1974
<br />July 15. 1975
<br />. -
<br />~~.~.~_~.-:::...- :e. ~ ::~;.-" ':".:"'_ -.-:=_-.::..."':.::....:...:'"....... ~.-_-..~ ~ ":' - -.-_-'" -;:.~ - - ~ :-_~...:....!". "": -:. ..._-; -; :'~=-~ ~.'='"':.~~..1"'~~~_..=--.o"l.:-...:...-_....~~_~IfIl.:1Il,.....~~_~'IU't~~.~~~~_-_.... --.- -.....'"t.J'l -.~.e~ ~.~-"~_-_~~.-.....:".~,,~'"...,............._ -- -- -_... ..._.~_........~
<br />
<br />
<br />9/16/74 - 3
<br />~2o
<br />
|