09/09/1974 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

I;J .- - ~ --." . .~__ '0' _ __ "_ .._. - .. _ +~n 3.; Petition, Paving alley between 15th and 16th, Hilyard to Alder - Petitioned by i owners of 55% of property to be assessed. Manager said there were no single-family; : dwellings 1nvolved. All of the properties to be assessed were occupied either by : , apartment or sorority house -uses. Staff recommended proceeding. ,/ - Corom / Mrs. Campbell moved seconded by Mr. Wood to approve the petition. 9/4!JA Motion carried unanimously. Approve --'--'. " .:~ ..-.'- . ..-. -...-"', -.- F. l. Condemnation, Sidewalk on south side of Bailey Lane from Coburg Road east 355.3't - { Authorization requested' for additional street right-of-way for sidewalk construction 'along property in the ownership of Ethel Gustafson, 30 Bailey Lane. Connn I .' 8/28/74/ I Mr. Williams moved seconded by Mr. Hershner to authorize condemnation. . ----- Motion carried unanimously. See B~ It wa.s understood tha.t this item would be placed on file since the bid on the sidewalk had been rejected as being too high. . :... ...... + ---".. -<." - ..--_.. --- --- 2. Condemna-tiC;;n for sani tary sewer easement sputh from south end of Happy Lane -, south of Goodpasture Island Road (Happy Lan~ Development, Ltd.) ___ Authorization was requested for the condemnation of a l4-foot easement (60-foot : construction easement) for the Willakenzie trunk sanitary sewer system over land i I owned by Happy Lane Development. \ Connn . . 9/4/74: . Mrs. Beal moved seconded by Mr. Wood to author~ze the condemnat~on as S B 1 : ee e ow requested. Motion carried unanimoUSly. j It was understood that this item would be placed on file since a negotiated settle- ment was achieved. G. ,iResol~ti6n, Na"t;l"onaFifnei?FTPolic-rj - Councilwoman--campb~il- ;'e~d a prepared-; istatement requesting the Council to instruct staff to prepare a resolution for !Council adoption at its next meeting expr~ssing the city's views on the National: iEnergy Policy.' She said the National League of Cities Environmental Committee, ,of which she was a member, was urging cities to present testimony at Federal ; Energy Administration hearings throughout the country questioning whether the ~\ iNationalenergy policy should focus on the single goal of energy independence. ------- ;She said she would like the Council to consider having representation at the r ~ !hearing in Portland on September 13 to at least read the proposed resolution \ 'asking that the National policy pursue other ways of minimizing environmental ! damage and pollution, and urging conservation and judicious uses of energy not : being considered at the present time. Also, that a paper could be prepared i : in more detail to be forwarded to the NLC Comrr.dttee, ahd to John Sawhill, I administrator of the FEA, New Postoffice Building, 1200 Independence Avenue, I Washington, D. C ., 20461. - Mrs. Campbell moved seconded by Mr. Murray to instruct staff to '. prepare a resolution stating the city's position with regard to Corom National- Energy Policy for Cotmcil consid.eration at its next 9/4/74 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. Approve \ It was understood materials with regard to the National policy would be repro-,' duced and distributed to Council members prior to t~e next Council meeting. / (**See Itemp-E) / "'0'''''' n _'__'__'. _no"' H. iHousing Disper;~i Policy Plan - . Discus;;ion continued from previous committee -~-e~tin-g iwith Councilman Williams restating that the impetus for the report was housing Ipolicy statements previously made on the desirability of dispersing low-income ~ ihousing to the extent it could be done throughout the city to provide social inter- faction between people of socioeconomic spectrums. Councilman Wood asked for some \ I evaluation of the rela,tionship of the proposed dispersal policy wi th - the new ,Housing' and Community Develop~ent Act of 1974. 'Betty Niven, member of the Joint Housing Committee, said that the new law provided :for a limit of 80% of the median income for eligibility in any subsidized program. ! ~In the Eugene area, she said, that would mean an upper income limit of about $9600 .. lfor low-income housing, with the only constraint being that 30% must be rented to :families having income below half the median. Also, the requirement for a resolu- 'tion of the governing body authorizing a housing authority to undertake any type of program was deleted. Instead, the governing body is notified of an.application i 'and given an opportunity to comment on the proposal on the basis of its adopted I ~ 9/16/74 - 8 325