04/23/1986 Meeting (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e VII. METROPOLITAN MID-PERIOD REVIEW (memo, background information distributed) City Manager Michea1 Gleason introduced discussion of the Metropolitan Mid- Period Review. Planning Director Susan Brody gave the staff report. She said most of the proposed amendments to the Metro General Plan were tenta- tively approved by the council. She said the Metropolitan Policy Committee (MPC) discussed the issues on which Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County did not agree and recommended a compromise. She said the compromise reflected Eugene's position except a few wording changes concerning Goal 5 resources and a completion date for the archeological working paper. CB 2880--An ordinance amending the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan. Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill be read the second time by council bill number only, with unanimous consent of the council, and that enactment be considered at this time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, 7:0. Mr. Holmer said he will vote in favor of this motion and against the next motion. e Council Bill 2880 was read the second time by council bill number only. Mr. Hansen moved, seconded by Ms. Ehrman, that the bill be approved and given final passage. Mr. Holmer said he was concerned about three changes which had not been identified when the council considered the changes previously. They were: 1. The amendment to Policy #36 on Page III-C-11 of the Metro Plan (page II-29 of the changes) which concerns ways in which newly identified natural resources or sites shall be addressed; 2. The amendment which will add Policies #6, #7, and #8 on Page 111-1-2 of the Metro Plan (page 11-37 of the changes) which indicates local jurisdictions shall develop a working paper and adopt policy guide- lines for resource management of archaeological sites and shall develop a list of experts qualified to assist with the identifica- tion and evaluation of archaeological sites; and 3. Changes to Chapter IV (Plan Review, Amendment, Refinement, and Jurisdictional Responsibility) (page 11-44 of the changes) which indicates the council will not be notified of refinement plans of other jurisdictions if the planning director decides that the plans do not conflict with the Metro Plan. . MINUTES--Eugene City Council April 23, 1986 Page 9