Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III. WORK SESSION: REFUSE COLLECTION ISSUES: MECHANIZED CURBSIDE <br />COLLECTION RATE AND CITY'S ROLE IN REGULATION OF REFUSE <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the item. Terri Vanderpool of the <br />Development Department said the council will hold a public hearing on a <br />proposed ordinance which would establish a formula for determining the minimum <br />rate for residential curbside refuse collection service in Eugene. She said <br />the work session is an opportunity for the council to learn about the proposed <br />ordinance and other issues related to refuse collection. <br /> <br />A. Mechanized Curbside Collection Rate <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Greta Utecht, Special Permits Supervisor, said residential curbside refuse <br />collection is a new service in Eugene. Previously, refuse hauling companies <br />in the city have provided backyard service. She said the City has a minimum <br />rate for residential backyard refuse collection from standard 32-gallon <br />containers but the City has no minimum rate for mechanized curbside service. <br />She said the City's minimum rate for backyard service is calculated from a <br />base rate and the Lane County tipping fee. The proposed residential curbside <br />minimum rate is calculated from the base rate, a discount for increased <br />efficiency, the cost of the hauler-provided container, and the tipping fee. <br />The curbside service can be provided by companies that buy mechanized trucks <br />that can be operated by one person. The service is less expensive for <br />customers than collection of an equal amount of refuse from the backyard. <br /> <br />Answering questions from Ms. Ehrman, Ms. Vanderpool said the City's current <br />position is difficult because the curbside, mechanized service has been <br />provi ded by one haul er for several months even though the Ci ty has no <br />established minimum rate for the service. Mr. Gleason added that technically <br />the company offering the s'ervice is violating a City ordinance and should <br />receive a citation. <br /> <br />Replying to questions from Mr. Rutan.and Ms. Bascom, Ms. Utecht said most of <br />the refuse hauling companies support the proposed formula and minimum rate. <br />Ms. Vanderpool said curbside service is optional. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller said the council should seriously consider the visual pollution <br />caused by refuse cans left at the curb. <br /> <br />Answering a question from Mr. Bennett, Ms. Utecht said one hauler objected to <br />the proposed minimum rate for curbside service because that hauler would like <br />the City's minimum rate to be based on the actual amount of refuse collected. <br />However, all minimum rates in the city and most of those in other cities are <br />based on the capacity of containers. She said it would be very difficult to <br />enforce a rate based on how much refuse is put into a container. She said <br />refuse hauling companies can provide either 60- or gO-gallon containers. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer said he has curbside service and a gO-gallon container. He likes <br />the service. He said the proposed rate is about 25 percent more than he pays <br />now. When asked whether recycling was included in the recommended rate, <br />Ms. Utecht said the cost of the recyclying service provided by refuse hauling <br />companies is included in the base rate. It is not affected by the proposed <br />minimum rate for gO-gallon containers. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 25, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />