Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> property under County ownership. He said the expansion area has high building <br /> and 1 and vancancy rates. He added that only one major development has <br /> e occurred in the area within the last 20 years (the IBM building across from <br /> the Hult Center parking garage). <br /> Ms. Ehrman said this building is definitely not blighted; therefore, inclusion <br /> of it in the expansion area does not fit with the criteria for expansion. Mr. <br /> Byrne said this building was included in the proposed expansion area because <br /> of the desire not to create lIislandsll or non-contiguous areas in the district. <br /> Mr. Byrne mentioned that among owners in the expansion area, there is a 75 <br /> percent approval rating of the proposed expansion (two owners oppose the <br /> expansion). In response to a question from Mr. Rutan, Mr. Byrne said the 75 <br /> percent figure is based on land area. <br /> Mr. Byrne said that if the expansion area is developed at the intensity <br /> expected by staff, a new parking garage would be needed. He said the Central <br /> Area Transportation Study (CATS) calls for an additional parking structure to <br /> meet the needs of future development within the expansion area. <br /> In response to this, Ms. Ehrman mentioned that the Hult Center lot is under- <br /> ut il i zed. Mr. Byrne agreed, but said staff views this lot as serving the area <br /> to the west. <br /> City Manager Micheal Gleason asked Mr. Byrne to explain the improvement-to- <br /> land (IlL) ratio. Mr. Byrne said this ratio is the value of the improvements <br /> made to a piece of land (primarily the value of the building) divided by the <br /> value of the land. He said that in healthy commercial districts, one expects <br /> e this ratio to be about 3.0 or higher. Downtown Eugene's ratio is about 2.7. <br /> He said some of the downtown's most intensely developed properties probably <br /> have IlL ratios of 8 or 10. <br /> Questioning the use of the IlL ratio as a measure of economic growth, Mr. <br /> Holmer made the point that if traffic increases in front of a building, the <br /> value of the land would increase. However, because investment in the land <br /> would remain the same, the IlL ratio would actually decrease. Mr. Byrne <br /> agreed that there are certain anomalies in the way the assessment system <br /> works. For example, the assessed value of land tends to increase after it is <br /> developed, even though the land itself has not changed. <br /> Ms. Bascom said she had read Mr. Holmer's June 22, 1987, memo to the Mayor and <br /> council, in which he discusses the IlL ratio in more depth. She said the ratio <br /> can be used as a measure of economic intensity. She said a healthy downtown <br /> area has an intensity of development different than, say, the intensity one <br /> might see in a residential area. <br /> Mr. Bennett said he interpreted Mr. Holmer's memo to mean that when <br /> development occurs on a piece of land, if the value of the total property <br /> increases over time, that value reverts to the land. However, he said he did <br /> not understand Mr. Holmer's point. He said the overall goal is to increase <br /> the intensity of downtown development. He said that when new development <br /> occurs, the IlL ratio will increase. <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 24, 1987 Page 4 <br />