Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> supports additional revenues and additional user fees to meet current needs. <br /> He favors implementing expenditure reductions before approving ignificant <br /> e new taxes. He would support a new tax if it would decrease property taxes or <br /> reduce the City's reliance on property taxes in the future and if the new tax <br /> is dedicated to capital projects. He said capital projects could be a library <br /> or things in the Economic Development Strategic Plan. <br /> I. Comments From Lay Budget Committee Members <br /> Ms. Eaton sa i d the 1 ay members of the Budget Commi ttee appreci ated the <br /> opportunity to observe the council's discussion. She said the lay members <br /> want to discuss their observations, so they will meet on December 10. She <br /> invited the councilors to observe that meeting. <br /> Mr. McLoud suggested the lay members of the Budget Committee undertake the <br /> process just completed by the council. He suggested council meetings be <br /> televised and said the public could learn much from televised meetings. He <br /> said it seemed all projects lIabove the linell will be funded and $50,000 for <br /> Laurelwood Golf Course is lIabove the line.1I He said he supports user fees. He <br /> noted that many of the programs "below the linell are operated by volunteers <br /> and said many programs above the line do not impact as many people as some <br /> programs below the line. <br /> Ms. Rich said she would like to consider specific terms for dedicated revenues <br /> after which they would go into the General Fund. She said it is esier to get <br /> the pub 1 i c to approve tax increases if the revenues are dedicated. She <br /> wondered why decreases in the central overhead costs were not discssed by the <br /> council. <br /> '_ Mr. Short said the process the council used is good. He said expenditure <br /> reduction is the first priority, in his opinion. He said he doesnot support <br /> one-time adjustments or reductions in the working capital that might affect <br /> other funds or the City's bond rating. He said councilors have shown wisdom <br /> during this process. <br /> Ms. Robinhold and Ms. Eaton said they agree with Mr. Short. Ms. Eaon said she <br /> would like more information about a restaurant tax and the costs of its <br /> administration. <br /> Responding to a question from Mayor Obi e, Mr. Gleason said the central <br /> overhead does not relate specifically to the General Fund of $60 million and <br /> the other funds totaling $60 million and some of the central overhad is fixed <br /> regardless of expenditure reductions. The staff had tried to include the <br /> overhead for specific programs in the cost estimates presented to the council. <br /> He said the expenditure reductions discussed by the council would have very <br /> little affect, perhaps two percent, on the central overhead cost. <br /> Mayor Obie said the council was considering a four-percent decrease in the <br /> General Fund and a two-percent overall decrease, which could result in some <br /> central overhead decrease. <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 30, 1987 Page 9 <br /> I <br /> I <br />