Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />encouraged examination and attempted to control growth in the total tax <br />burden. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett said the goal session had included a lively discussion of how <br />to approach the fiscal situation, and a strong commitment had been made <br />to balance the budget. He said he recalled the City Manager saying that <br />the $2.4 million goal could be accommodated without additional revenue, <br />and although he did not support raising additional revenues in the first <br />year, he would support the general plan. Mr. Bennett added that his <br />support would be stronger if new revenues were allocated to capital <br />projects, because he agreed with Mr. Holmerls concerns in that area. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie said he favored moving ahead with the plan as the executive <br />budget proposal, and while he personally did not favor a restaurant tax, <br />he was not opposed to a restaurant tax as a new revenue source if that <br />was the will of the community. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie said the council should either move ahead and let Mr. Gleason <br />use the plan as a general guideline, or ask staff to come back with <br />additional recommendations. He said he is operating under the assumption <br />that the City will fall short in its efforts to obtain new revenues. He <br />predicted the cuts will not be enough, and the capital budget will <br />ultimately suffer. <br /> <br />Councilors did not reach a consensus that they needed to reballot the <br />budget priorities. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mayor Obie said the council should ask the executive managers to prepare <br />an executive budget with the discussed guidelines. He asked Mr. Gleason <br />how the priority choices were made. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason said City Managerls Office staff met with the executive <br />managers on three occasions. He said the group made a commitment to <br />follow the council's voting preferences as closely as possible. The <br />process began with proposals developed by an executive managers <br />subcommittee, the Budget Review Team. The proposals were presented to <br />the executive managers, who debated their merits and eventually developed <br />the "blue sheet." He said the blue sheet is an attempt to accomplish the <br />budget balancing goal without a major disruption to the community and <br />organization. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason said the managers were all willing to professionally respond <br />to the need for cuts. He said cuts in one department often dramatically <br />affect other departments. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Miller, Mr. Gleason said executive <br />managers had the same type of discussion over capital budgets. He <br />reminded councilors that staff originally made the recommendation that <br />the council establish an ongoing capital budget. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer asked if the council can be provided with an impact statement <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 1, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />