02/01/1988 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

- but he was ready to go with the implementation proposal if a new revenue source could be identified. Mr. Miller said he felt the information provided a beginning. He said he shared the concerns about capital projects, and he favored looking at revenue sources, because he thought that would drive further decisions. Ms. Ehrman agreed with concerns about capital projects. She said she favored examining a combination of cuts and revenue, and she was committed to looking at another revenue source. Ms. Ehrman said she felt that two of the tax proposals, the real estate transfer tax and the utility tax, were too similar to property taxes, and she was not interested in those. She said she favored a restaurant tax as affecting those with a choice and expendable incomes, and she would favor an alcohol tax if it were across-the-board. Ms. Ehrman asked when specific cuts should be addressed. She noted that she had missed the second meeting of balloting and decisions, and she was concerned about the tendency to move ahead without the details. She said she felt that mall maintenance, for example, was a substantial impact, and she wondered about alternatives. - Ms. Wooten asked how the cuts for various years had been chosen. She said the impact statements still were unclear about staff and program reductions, but she did appreciate the information. She said original votes had been taken without the benefit of that data, and she now would vote differently. Ms. Wooten said she believed modifications would be made, and some items above the line should be considered, perhaps with another ballot. She said she was uncomfortable committing to a strategic financial plan without some agreement on revenue sources. Ms. Wooten said she did not think the service fee or a tax on alcohol would be plausible or efficient, and she continued to support a real estate transfer tax, but she primarily supported a restaurant tax, which, if implemented by January 1, would be a certain income factor against the cuts. Ms. Schue said she agreed with many of the concerns, but alternatives needed to be considered. She said she also had been frustrated about the lack of information when balloting, and she therefore was willing to allow staff flexibility in making actual" cuts. Ms. Schue said she was very interested in new revenues, and some cuts, such as mall maintenance, presented problems. She also noted that the library would be another factor to consider along with major capital projects on which preliminary work has already been done. She added that she agreed with the need to make a decision on the restaurant tax soon. e Mr. Rutan said he, too, was interested in looking at new revenues, and he thought it was important to look at general criteria such as costs of administration, revenues generated, affected population bases, equity, etc. He said the budget did represent growth in government, and he noted that total costs in year six were substantially higher than total costs in year one. He said he thought cuts were difficult but were the responsibility of the City Council and were healthy because they MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 1, 1988 Page 9