Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />IV. WORK SESSION: FUTURE LIBRARY PROJECT <br /> <br />City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the item. Pat Decker, Planning <br />Department, presented the staff report. She said the council is <br />scheduled to take formal action on the report at its February 22 meeting. <br /> <br />Ms. Decker reviewed a four-step process staff has outlined for the <br />council to address the scope, financing, public review, and design of the <br />library process over the next ten months. The four-step process calls <br />for the entire council to first discuss the scope from March through May. <br />A council subcommittee will address the financing question during the <br />second step from June through September. Public input is the third step <br />and has been scheduled for sometime in September and October. Project <br />design, step four, will take place from October through December. It <br />will incoporate decisions reached in the scope and financing discussions <br />and will set forth components for the future library design. March 1989 <br />has been scheduled for a public vote on financing issues if one is <br />required. Ms. Decker cautioned that the council should not be too <br />specific about design matters so the public does not find itself voting <br />on the actual design of the library. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom said it is a good idea to establish a subcommittee to handle <br />the specific items of the processls second stage (financing). Ms. Schue <br />e and Ms. Ehrman said they also approve of the subcommittee proposal. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer said the project scope is not as comprehensive as he thought <br />it was going to be, and does not include the question of site location. <br />He asked if the site issue should be included as part of the scope <br />discussions. Ms. Decker said the scope discussions are the appropriate <br />place to address the site question. She said council has not formally <br />indicated to staff any questions on the site recommendation. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer asked council members for their opinion on whether the council <br />should consider the question of site. Ms. Ehrman said she does not want <br />to consider it again because of her tenure on The Future of Our Library <br />Committee. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller said it is important for the council to come to a conclusion <br />on the site as part of its discussions on the scope of the library. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer asked if other people should be added to the process. Ms. <br />Decker said the process is already set up to incorporate comments from <br />groups such as the Downtown Commission and Library Board. Ms. Ehrman <br />suggested the process should include input from the Eugene Downtown <br />Association. Ms. Schue said she hopes the Broadway vacation discussions <br />will include representatives from the Public Works Department. Ms. <br />Decker added the scope discussions will include the Broadway vacation <br />issue. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 10, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br />