Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Crystal Shope, 860 River Loop No.1, spoke for cruisers and against the <br />ordinance. She said the main problem she saw with closing liThe Gut" was <br />increasing drug use by teenagers in the Eugene-Springfield area. <br />Ms. Shope said many activities had been closed recently, such as <br />drive-ins, and she did not think the ordinance was a good idea. <br /> <br />Brad Perkins, 1590 Mill or 37 West 13th Avenue, spoke in opposition to <br />the ordinance. Mr. Perkins expressed his support for the youth <br />commission and its four-part planning process. He said he thought the <br />group had put in a lot of effort to try and resolve the issue. He also <br />said he supported the youth who had been seeking an alternative such as <br />shifting the location to West 11th. He said he was not sure why problems <br />continued at that location, since the area was mostly non-residential. <br />Mr. Perkins said he did not think the community could solve a social <br />issue by changing the face of the problem, because causes went much <br />deeper than that. He said he hoped the council would review and consider <br />the recommendations from the youth commission. <br /> <br />Donnie R. Hedlind, 2285 West 29th Avenue, spoke for cruising. <br />Mr. Hedlind said he had helped to initiate the move to West 11th Avenue, <br />and he thought it had worked well, except for problems with littering. <br />He said that if litter could be controlled, he thought that location <br />would work well. He also said he had talked to many young people who <br />stated that because they had nothing to do, they partied, and if they had <br />someplace to go and something to do, they wouldn't party all the time. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Nancy J. Reynolds, 1858 University, submitted written comments in <br />opposition to the ordinance: lilt is repressive and anti-youth; we're <br />sending the wrong message to our young people." <br /> <br />Mayor Obie closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Mason responded to testimony. He said it was not the intent of the <br />Police Division to send the message that youth were not liked or wanted. <br />He said criminal conduct was not required for problems to occur, but <br />complaints now included noise, air pollution, and traffic congestion, <br />which were not acceptable to residents and businesses in the area. He <br />noted that a disproportionate number of officers had been assigned to <br />liThe Gut" and said such concentrated deployment was not an effective <br />tactic Tor serving the entire community. Mr. Mason said the issue of <br />unintentional violations would require the assistance and support of <br />citizens in the area. He said it was not the intent or the policy of the <br />police division that enforcement occur in a random or haphazard manner, <br />and areas would be designated by the police chief based on the number of <br />complaints and problems in an area. He said officers did enforce alcohol <br />laws on South Willamette Street. He also said the move to West 11th <br />Avenue had caused significant problems, such as litter and requiring <br />early closures, for business owners, and the Department of Public Safety <br />was concerned about mixed speeds and traffic congestion in that area. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman asked whether the issue of cruising was being addressed by the <br />Cops-in-the-Schools program. Ms. Wooten also asked about the involvement <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 22, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 11 <br />