Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Alan Maxwell, 1246 Spyglass Drive, said he is president of Sunny Service <br />Stations. Mr. Maxwell said he is in opposition to the interim sign code. He <br />said the planned revision is highly restrictive and would not allow Sunny <br />Service Stations to continue to erect signs it has already commenced to build <br />throughout the area. <br /> <br />Mr. Maxwell said the company1s problems with the City began a year ago when <br />it took 11 months for the City to approve a sign at the Sunny1s 7th Avenue <br />and Van Buren Street station. He said this compares with sign approval <br />processes that took one to two days in Veneta, Springfield, and Junction <br />City. He said the company has a goal to bring clear, easily visible gasoline <br />price signs to the community. Mr. Maxwell suggested the City delay action on <br />the interim sign code, and consider segregating the gasoline price issue into <br />a separate section. <br /> <br />Ronald S. Bergeson, 2560 Frontier Drive, said he is an employee of Sunny <br />Service Stations. He said there has not been adequate time for members of <br />the public to review the interim sign code. He said a draft of the code was <br />scheduled to be available May 13. However, he said he was not able to obtain <br />a copy of the draft until well into the next week. He suggested the council <br />postpone action on the interim sign code until there has been time for staff <br />to gather input from the sign industry. <br /> <br />Mr. Bergeson said there are also problems with readerboard requirements in <br />the code as they relate to gasoline price displays required by the State. He <br />said it would be impossible to display gasoline prices in the maximum five <br />~ square feet allowed under the readerboard provision. <br /> <br />Kevin Jones, 1678 West 7th Avenue, said he ;s a local sign contractor and not <br />in favor of the interim sign code. He said it is essential that members of <br />the sign industry be allowed to participate in the creation of interim or <br />permanent sign codes. He said the proposed interim code goes beyond the <br />issue of content and is a IIquick-fix.1I He said it is unreasonable for the <br />council to expect the public to have a good understanding of the interim code <br />when it was not available until the Wednesday before the public hearing. He <br />suggested the council postpone creation of an interim code and establish a <br />committee composed of citizens, City staff, and representatives of the sign <br />industry to review the proposed code and make recommendations. <br /> <br />Vernon D. Gleaves, 975 Oak Street, said he represents Obie Outdoor <br />Advertising. He said he agrees with staff in that the Sign Code needs <br />revision. He said he is concerned that the proposed interim ordinance makes <br />substantive changes with reference to billboards. He said the interim <br />ordinance in its current form is more restrictive than the present ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleaves said adoption of the interim ordinance would prohibit loca~ing <br />billboards in those areas where they are designated by the original code. He <br />distributed to the council copies of the interim ordinance that contain <br />proposed amendments to the interim code that he has drafted. He said the <br />proposed amendments would retain strict controls and make the City consistent <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 23, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br />