Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e the will of the people who approved the ordinance. She said she would <br /> hesitate to rely heavily on a survey that had only 58 out of 300 responses. <br /> She pointed out the phrase "primary intended purpose" has been adopted by the <br /> City in other ordinances. She said the people in this community were <br /> speaking on more than a symbolic level when they voted in favor of a Nuclear <br /> Free Zone. <br /> Eugene Emge, 2181 Washington Street, said he works as a certified public <br /> accountant and has several business clients who chose to locate in Eugene <br /> because of the social environment. Mr. Emge offered a demonstration to <br /> illustrate the falsity of the "security blanket of nuclear weapons." He <br /> dropped a single bb into a bucket to demonstrate the total destructive power <br /> of weapons used during World War II. Then, he spent approximately 90 seconds <br /> pouring bb's into a bucket to illustrate the destructive power of the worldls <br /> current nuclear arsenal. <br /> Gretchen Miller, no address given, said it would be a mistake to have the <br /> Nuclear Free Zone locked into the City Charter. However, she said the <br /> council should also remember that the Nuclear Free Zone has been passed twice <br /> by voters. She suggested the council proceed gently with the argument that <br /> the voters did not know what they were voting on when they approved the <br /> Nuclear Free Zone. <br /> Bill Lioio, 3676 Sisters View Avenue, said it is a terrible thing for the <br /> City to make it illegal for a citizen to engage in what has been established <br /> as the bipartisan national defense policy. He said Congress should make <br />e those types of decisions. He said the Nuclear Free Zone is an idealistic <br /> goal that dishonors people who have worn armed service uniforms. <br /> Robert Rounsley, 476 East Broadway, said the council should take note of all <br /> the people in the audience who support a strong nuclear free zone. He said <br /> the council should not be afraid to give peace a chance. <br /> Peter alDay, 2425 Jefferson, said he is a scientist who works with statistics <br /> every day. He said 59 percent of the businesses responding to the Chamber of <br /> Commerce's survey indicated they would not move to Eugene if nuclear power <br /> was outlawed. He said nuclear power is already outlawed in Eugene and those <br /> results should have been thrown out of the survey. He said the survey shows <br /> that 70 percent of the respondents would settle in Eugene despite a Nuclear <br /> Free Zone, while 30 percent said they would not care. He said the City <br /> Council should disregard the information contained in the survey since both <br /> the president and vice-president of the Chamber of Commerce have admitted the <br /> survey is not valid. <br /> Cynthia Muntwyler, 131 North Grand Street, said she supports a broad Nuclear <br /> Free Zone. She said she is angry that she has had to vote twice on the <br /> issue, She said she is appalled at the narrow scope of the businesses that <br /> responded to the Chamber of Commerce's survey. By approving the Nuclear Free <br /> Zone, she said the citizens of Eugene showed that their first priority is <br />e MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 13, 1988 Page 6 <br />