Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e Mr. Holmer asked how the council will be able to judge the policy recommenda- <br /> tions without a financial perspective. Mr. Gleason said he is working from <br /> the assumption that the council wants to balance the budget over a six-year <br /> time period; that half of the money will come from revenues and half from <br /> cuts; that programs should be redesigned, if possible, and revenues should be <br /> focused on user fees; and that no additional services should be added. Mr. <br /> Gleason said he is also operating under the assumption that policy initia- <br /> tives are not appropriate for this process. <br /> In response to a question from Mr. Bennett, Mr. Gleason said staff will also <br /> draft a balanced budget that has no new major revenue sources. He said staff <br /> will most likely be able to present the council with a preliminary budget <br /> reading by November 1988. At that point, the council can determine whether <br /> the policy statements are realistic. <br /> Mr. Holmer asked what this will do to the overall budget review process. Mr. <br /> Wong said the council might be able to receive a budget in late April or May <br /> under the new proposal. <br /> Mr. Holmer asked where the Budget Committee will fit into the new process. <br /> Ms. Wooten said the has not heard any proposals that would change the Budget <br /> Committee's current role. Mr. Bennett said the council should define at the <br /> outset how much the policy decisions mean to the council. Ms. Wooten said <br /> this raises the same question that came up during the last budget process: <br /> is the council binding itself and the Budget Committee to the policy posi- <br /> tions? <br />e Mr. Miller said policy setting is the job of the council, not the Budget <br /> Committee. Mr. Rutan said the Budget Committee would hopefully interpret the <br /> council.s policies as general guidelines. He said the Budget Committee will <br /> take the general policy statements and the specific budget dollars and recon- <br /> cile the two. He said the lay members of the Budget Committee will hopefully <br /> realize that the council has spent a Significant amount of time researching <br /> the budget policies. <br /> Ms. Wooten left the meeting at 8:15 p.m. <br /> Ms. Bascom questioned the level of detail that has traditionally been used <br /> with the Budget Committee. She suggested that staff bring back a proposal <br /> for improving the Budget Committee process. Ms. Ehrman said improving the <br /> process should be done with input from the whole Budget Committee. <br /> Ms. Thorne said the Budget Committee's role is difficult to determine until <br /> the process reaches the third stage. She summarized that the council has <br /> generally agreed on the level of specificity within the process, and that the <br /> role of the Budget Committee is still unresolved. She asked each councilor <br /> to state his or her feelings about the proposal. <br /> Mr. Rutan said he likes the process. Mr. Holmer expressed reservations about <br />e MINUTES--City Council July 27, 1988 Page 7 <br />