Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e Mr. Bennett stated that he was not interested in using computers for <br /> communication for council business. <br /> At Ms. Wooten's suggestion, Mayor Obie asked staff to provide information <br /> about School District 4J's resolution of the question of open public meetings <br /> being circumvented by computer communication between board members. He also <br /> directed staff to provide information about the school board's use and <br /> experience. Additionally, he asked that information about estimated capital <br /> and maintenance costs be provided for the Goals Session discussion. <br /> Mr. Boles added that it is not necessary for the entire council to adopt <br /> computer use, and he intended to raise the issue in the larger context of <br /> information and communication. Mayor Obie noted that the issue would have <br /> to receive a sufficient number of council votes at the Goals Session to be <br /> placed on an agenda and he advised Mr. Boles that he would have the <br /> opportunity to lobby prior to the session. <br /> IV. COUNCIL DECISION-MAKING PROCESS <br /> Ms. Wooten expressed hope that appointments to the Lincoln School committee <br /> would be made soon and she asked to work with Mayor Obie to expedite the <br /> process. Mayor Obie noted that the application of non-City of Eugene <br /> residents had delayed the decision-making process. <br />e Ms. Wooten expressed the opinion that the council is having difficulty making <br /> decisions. She pointed out that when recommendations come to the council <br /> from boards and commissions, the council delays making controversial <br /> decisions by holding a work session. She said the council is on the verge of <br /> obstructing its own ability to get things done by the length of its <br /> deliberations. <br /> Mayor Obie observed that the nuclear free zone and Willamette Street issues <br /> were examples of important decisions requiring thoughtful deliberation. <br /> Mr. Bennett cited the historic preservation ordinance as a situation in which <br /> the council received a specific recommendation from an appointed body and <br /> then heard public testimony that differed with the recommendation. Mr. <br /> Bennett thought it would be inappropriate to make a quick decision without <br /> careful consideration of both sides of the issue. <br /> Mr. Holmer suggested that when the council is faced with the types of <br /> situations referred to by Mr. Bennett, it would be possible to deliberate <br /> without postponing the matter. He said there was a tradition of avoiding <br /> making amendments during regular meetings without referring issues back to <br /> staff, but if the council was willing to spend the time having policy <br /> discussions during its meetings, issues could be addressed and decisions <br /> reached without further delay. He referred to the purchasing issue as an <br /> example of unnecessary delay of a needed discussion. <br />_. MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 19, 1988 Page 12 <br /> Quarterly Process Session <br />