Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />At Ms. Schue's request, consideration of Council Bill 4131, concerning <br />skateboards, was held over to a future council agenda. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan commented that without the mall, many of the problems the <br />ordinances attempt to address would not exist. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett said the mall is under-used public space. He objected to some of <br />the language in the findings of the proposed mall ordinance (CB 4129), <br />specifically reference to the renewal area as vital, as being an inviting <br />pedestrian environment used by a broad segment of the community, and as <br />providing a beautiful environment in the downtown core area that lends <br />identity to the community. He maintained that the mall is none of these and <br />said the type of regulations proposed in the ordinance will not ensure the <br />purposes for which the mall was constructed. Mr. Bennett disagreed that the <br />pushcart program and kiosks ensure the quality of merchandising. He asked <br />for further consideration of the statement regarding the exclusion of <br />vehicular traffic (Section 4.870). <br /> <br />Ms. Bohman responded that the findings referred to by Mr. Bennett are new <br />language intended to make a case for why the regulations in the ordinance are <br />needed. Mr. Bennett said he would support the ordinance despite his concern <br />that the language of the findings does not describe accurately the existing <br />condition or perfopmance of the mall. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles said the findings describe what is being sought with the mall <br />rather than existing conditions. He stated that reopening the mall to <br />vehicular traffic is not necessarily a solution that will achieve an <br />effective and vital downtown core area. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer indicated he would support the mall and noise ordinances, but <br />shared Mr. Bennett1s concern with the language of the findings. He <br />encouraged the council to avoid adding political rhetoric to its ordinances <br />as a means of providing background and rationale for regulations. <br /> <br />CB 4129--An ordinance concerning the Downtown Pedestrian Mall; <br />amending Sections 4.870, 4.871, 4.872, 4.876, 4.877, <br />and 4.879 of the Eugene Code, 1971; repealing Section <br />4.878 of that code; adding Sections 4.880 and 4.881 <br />to that code; and declaring an emergency. <br /> <br />CB 4130--An ordinance concerning noise disturbance; amending <br />Section 4.084 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring <br />an emergency. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom moved, seconded by Mr. Rutan, that the bills, with <br />unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by <br />council bill numbers only, and that enactment be considered at <br />this time. Roll call vote; the motion passed unanimously, <br />8:0. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 27, 1989 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br />