Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Gary said he felt it <br />to meet its objectives. <br />staff develop a racially <br />inadequate participation <br /> <br />is possible that the City could recast the program <br />He said the City Attorney's Office recommends that <br />neutral program that addresses identified causes of <br />by certain categories of contractors. <br /> <br />Mr. Gary noted that the City Attorney's Office had contacted the US Depart- <br />ment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) which now claims that HUD regula- <br />tions do not permit set-aside programs for HUD funds, due to the presence of <br />a non-discrimination provision in the department's regulations. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller said that he recommended that this proposal be returned to the <br />Community Development Committee (eOC) for reconsideration and revision. Mr. <br />Gleason voiced his concern that if the proposal returns to the COC, findings <br />need to be very carefully written to avoid possible lawsuits. <br /> <br />Referring to CCED minutes, Mr. Rutan pointed out that this program has re- <br />ceived mixed reviews and deserves a chance to succeed. Given this, he said <br />he wanted to be sure that the City does not spend $100,000 to maintain a <br />$50,000-$100,000 program. He said he wanted to ensure a measured response to <br />this problem. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Boles said he expected that the City Council must have written its loan <br />agreement to include a hold harmless clause, in which case there would be no <br />risk of lawsuits. Second, he asked if there was a quick way to develop <br />findings. He noted that the original reason for development of the Targeted <br />Business Assistance program had been because the loan pattern from available <br />funds indicated that targeted groups were not competing successfully. He <br />felt that this should provide a quick and narrow base for findings. He <br />expressed his preference that the council not be significantly involved in <br />legal aspects of this issue. He felt it should be possible to meet the <br />community's expectations for the COBG program at $150,000 without having to <br />go through a lengthy legal process. He added that he feels women should be <br />included in the pool of targeted groups as well. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom commented that she is concerned with the City's involvement in <br />development of findings and with potentially huge legal bills. <br /> <br />Mr. Gary responded that he did not feel this to be a complicated legal prob- <br />lem. He did not anticipate that his office would be involved substantially <br />in development of findings. He recommended that the City develop a program <br />which does not require that staff make the findings. He felt this might be <br />possible as long as the council is not locked into classifications based upon <br />race or ethnic origin or some other protected class. He said the City could <br />attain its objective by directing staff to proceed in the least expensive, <br />most efficient way without having to develop findings at all. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett said he agreed with Mr. Boles and wanted to be able to support a <br />targeted business assistance program. He said he hopes it can be done legal- <br />ly in such a way, even if findings are required, that it can be completed in <br />a reasonable period of time. He said that his approach is to treat this <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />March 1, 1989 <br /> <br />Page 10 <br />