Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e planned as part of the proposed changes and they will be heard by the <br /> Hearings Official sometime in the future. <br /> Mr. Holmer asked for clarification of how the Eugene Planning Commission's <br /> recommendation differed from that of Lane County. Mr. Lilley explained that <br /> the commission recommendation was the same as the first option with two <br /> exceptions: the first relating to commercial designation of two parcels on <br /> River Road and the second relating to a potential rezoning action east of the <br /> Northwest Expressway. In response to Mr. Holmer's further question about <br /> rationale supporting the Planning Commission.s recommendations, Mr. Lilley <br /> said the commission did not support commercial designation on th~ two parcels <br /> in question because of concerns expressed by the citizen advisory team that <br /> developed the Urban Facilities Plan and by residents of the area. <br /> Planning Commissioner Ken Tollenaar said the Planning Commission interpreted <br /> the Urban Facilities Plan as directing that commercial strip development <br /> along River Road be contained. <br /> Mayor Miller opened the public hearing. <br /> G.D. Blair, 3950 Coburg Road, No. 24, owns property at 340 River Road. He <br /> spoke of the demolition of a residence and his subsequent loss of income. <br /> Saying the Chambers Connector rendered the property unsuitable for a <br /> residence, Mr. Blair urged the council to follow the County's appropriate <br /> action to designate his property as commercial. <br /> e Ed Kashin, 150 Knoop Lane, spoke on behalf of the River Road Community <br /> Organization and said residents oppose the addition of medium-density <br /> residential designation on the east side of River Road, north of Fir Lane. <br /> He reported that many residents have voiced concern regarding property <br /> values, additional traffic congestion, and general livability of the area. <br /> In addition, Mr. Kashin said the redesignation of two parcels north of . <br /> Holeman from low-density residential to commercial violates the River <br /> Road/Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan prohibition of linear expansion. Mr. <br /> Kashin maintained that the property at 340 River Road was erroneously <br /> redesignated commercial. Mr. Kashin urged the council to make decisions <br /> regarding the future of the River Road area with sensitivity to the wishes of <br /> residents. <br /> Bruce Tait, 465 Hunsaker Lane, identified himself as the owner of property at <br /> 330 River Road which is currently rented as a residence. He said the <br /> Planning Commission originally voted 7:0 in favor of rezoning the property as <br /> commercial. Mr. Tait said the completion of the Chambers Connector and the <br /> overpass makes the property appropriate for commercial uses only. He <br /> indicated that he wishes to annex to the City, obtain sewer hook up, and have <br /> his property zoned C-2. <br /> Al Johnson, 767 Willamette Street, spoke as the representative of Robert <br /> Laursen. He referred to a map in councilors. agenda materials and said Mr. <br /> Laursen's property was zoned industrial by the County approximately 20 years <br /> ago. The construction of a limited access highway removed access onto the <br /> e Northwest Expressway, resulting in a situation in which property is <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council August 14, 1989 Page 6 <br />