Laserfiche WebLink
<br />In addition, compatibility with greenway and Goal 5 resource values associated with the Willamette <br />River, riparian areas both north and south of the river, the Whilamut Natural Area and Eastgate <br />Woodlands will be further ensured through compliance with acknowledged Eugene and Springfield <br />permitting requirements adopted to implement Goals 15 and 5; Willamette River Greenway and <br />greenway setback review, and the Water Resources Conservation Overlay Zone, subj ect to <br />applicable standards and conditions. As noted earlier, the bridges are an existing use within the <br />ODOT right-of-way. This proposal replaces the original bridge with two new bridges: one for <br />northbound traffic, the other for southbound traffic, and replaces the Canoe Canal bridge. It also <br />removes the detour bridge. Given that a bridge has been accommodating highway traffic in this area <br />for decades, most new impacts will be associated with bridge construction or demolition. By <br />remaining within the existing ODOT right-of-way, and employing Best Management Practices and <br />other impact avoidance or mitigation techniques identified or required during the local permitting <br />processes, impacts to surrounding natural resource lands can be minimized to protect natural <br />resource qualities in and the use and enjoyment of the Willamette River, the Willamette River <br />gr~enway, and the Whilamut Natural Area and Eastgate Woodlands. <br /> <br />Based on the above findings, an exception to Goal 15 is warranted and meets the requirements of <br />OAR 660-0040-0020 for the placement of fill within the greenway setback for the 1-5 Willamette <br />Bridge Replacement project. <br /> <br />Therefore, the amendments and goal exception are consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 2. <br /> <br />Goal 3 - Agricultural Land: To preserve and maintain agricultural lands. <br /> <br />Goal 3 is not applicable to these amendments as the subject property and actions do not affect any <br />agricultural plan designation or use. Goal 3 excludes lands inside an acknowledged urban growth <br />boundary from the definition of agricultural lands. Since the subject property is entirely within the <br />acknowledged urban growth boundary, Goal 3 is not relevant and the amendments do not affect the <br />area's compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 3. <br /> <br />Goal 4 - Forest Land: To conserve forest lands. <br /> <br />Goal 4 is not applicable to these amendments as the subject property and actions do not affect any <br />forest plan designation or use. Goal 4 does not apply within urban growth boundaries and, <br />.. therefore, does not apply to the subject property, which is within the Eugene-Springfield urban <br />growth boundary (OAR 660-006-0020). Therefore, Goal 4 is not relevant and the anlendments do <br />not affect the area's compliance with Statewide Planning Goal 4. <br /> <br />Goal 5 - Open Spaces. Scenic and Historic Areas. and Natural Resources: To conserve open space <br />and protect natural and scenic resources. <br /> <br />The following administrative rule (OAR 660-023-0250) is applicable to this post-acknowledgement <br />plan amendment (PAPA) request: <br /> <br />(3) Local governments are not required to apply Goal 5 in consideration of a PAPA unless the <br />PAPA affects a Goal 5 resource. For purposes of this section, a PAPA would affect a Goal 5 <br /> <br />Exhibit A - Findings <br />Page 14 <br />