My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/22/1982 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1982
>
02/22/1982 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 3:58:27 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:36:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/22/1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />methods of keeping through traffic on the designated arterial streets in the <br />area. He said that the neighborhood group had attempted to distribute question- <br />naires to all the houses in the area. He indicated that of 966 questionnaires <br />delivered, 222 had been returned, for a response rate of 23 percent. He said <br />that 64 percent of those who responded had said that they favored efforts to <br />control traffic. Mr. Stafford said that the only form of traffic management <br />that the Public Works Department seemed to believe in was traffic diverters. <br />He urged the council to authorize installation of permanent diverters on 10th <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />Kate Rogers Gessert, 1230 West Broadway, said that a group of concerned neighbors <br />had recently conducted a house-to-house survey in the area affected by the <br />diverters. She said that of 236 households contacted, 137 favored retention of <br />the diverters; 65 were opposed; 22 were undecided; and 12 households were <br />vacant. She submitted a petition in favor of the diverters, signed by 224 <br />residents of the area and 81 people residing outside the survey area. She noted <br />that the area covered by the survey was the same as the area to which the City <br />had mailed its questionnaire and said that several residents had changed their <br />minds on the issue since the time of the City survey. Ms. Gessert encouraged <br />those who live in the area to accept the inconvenience caused by the diverters <br />as necessary for the protection of the safety and comfort of all area residents. <br /> <br />Ann Fidanque, 952 West 10th Avenue, said that in the time before installation of <br />the diverters, residents had noted increases in the volume and speed of traffic <br />in the area and increases in the number of accidents, particularly at the cor- <br />ners of 10th and Jackson and 10th and Adams. She said that since installation <br />of the diverters, traffic volume, traffic speed, and numbers of accidents had <br />been reduced. She urged councilors to weigh the mild inconvenience caused by <br />the diverters against the increased safety for children, cyclists, pedestrians, <br />and all people who use Monroe Park. Ms. Fidanque said that the City, through a <br />number of its policies, has encouraged families to settle in the downtown area <br />and that the City now has an obligation to ensure the safety of those families. <br /> <br />Mark Palmer, 801 West 12th Avenue, said that he has lived near the diverter at <br />12th and Monroe since 1978 and has noticed that the diverter has reduced the <br />number of speeders in the area, made the streets safer, and improved the identity <br />and quality of the neighborhood. He said that the City needs to use every <br />available tool in re-establishing the inner-city neighborhoods. He urged that <br />the diverters be retained. <br /> <br />Sarah Hendrickson, 572 West 11th Avenue, said that she lives in the area of the <br />diverters and also is a partner in a commercial investment in the area. She <br />said that the survey done by the Traffic Division on diverters was uneven and <br />that many residents in the area were not polled. She urged the council to seek <br />a compromise acceptable to all residents and suggested that if the diverters are <br />not acceptable, that stop signs be installed at all the corners of the inter- <br />sections involved. She said that residents of the area would volunteer to sweep <br />the streets in order to retain the diverters. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 22, 1982 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.