Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mike Pease, 1910 Charnel ton, said that he is an architect and had worked with <br />inner-city neighborhoods on neighborhood design issues on the block scale. He <br />said that in all of his work, he had found traffic control one of the greatest <br />concerns of inner-city residents. He urged the council to support the diverters <br />as one of the least expensive ways to control traffic. <br /> <br />George Gessert, 1230 West Broadway, said that he has lived in the area since <br />1978 and is the father of two small children. He said that he had contacted <br />eight real estate agents and assessors to determine the effects of diverters <br />on property values. He reported that these people had said it is easier to <br />sell homes on quiet streets with low traffic volumes. He said that some of <br />those contacted had responded that the presence of the diverters would have no <br />effect on the value of property, some had said the value would be increased, and <br />none had said that the value would be reduced by the presence of the diverters. <br />He said those contacted had responded that diverters would only cause a decrease <br />in property values if people had to go seven or eight blocks out of their way to <br />reach the property. <br /> <br />Elizabeth Meador, 1265 West Broadway, spoke for the eight small children who <br />live near her and urged that the diverters be retained. <br /> <br />Steve Wood, 971 West 10th Avenue, said he has lived in the area since 1974. He <br />said that the issue being discussed is the community's willingness to respond <br />to the needs of the neighborhood. He said that the City had made large commit- <br />ments in this area of Community Development and NIP funds, including housing <br />rehabilitation funds. He said he welcomed the City's attempts to mitigate the <br />effects of traffic in the neighborhood and urged that the diverters be retained. <br /> <br />At Mr. Andersen's request, all those who favored retention of the diverters <br />stood up. <br /> <br />Scott Lieuallen, 570 West 10th Avenue, said he owns a home in the Westside area <br />and has a made a long-term commitment to living in the Westside. He noted that <br />this area is surrounded by high-speed, high-volume arterials and said that the <br />City must protect the neighborhood from being destroyed by these forces. He <br />said that the value of the investment in the City's housing stock in this area <br />must be protected. <br /> <br />John E. Bonine, 1052 West 10th Avenue, said that he had chosen to buy his home <br />because of the presence of the diverter. He said that while residents had tried <br />to make calm presentations in favor of the diverters, there was a great deal of <br />feeling that had been held in check. He urged the council to keep the neighbor- <br />hood safe by retaining the diverters. <br /> <br />The following people testified in opposition to retaining the diverters: <br /> <br />Patrick Moore, 1060 Tyler Street, said that he has lived in the area for 20 <br />years. He said that if diverters were used to keep traffic off one street, <br />the traffic would just be pushed onto some other street. He said that since all <br />residents of the city are entitled to use all city streets, the residents of the <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 22, 1982 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />