Laserfiche WebLink
The public's concern for personal safety in the downtown is not unfounded. A 1995 <br />report by the Springfield Police Department identified the following types of crimes and <br />behavioral problems in the downtown district as being frequent and typical: <br /> <br />· Loitering and disorderly conduct <br />· Vandalism <br />· Panhandling <br />· Graffiti <br />· Littering <br />· Aggressive behavior <br /> <br />These problems remain central to the conditions in the downtown district. Moreover, <br />they are also interrelated with more long-term problems such as homelessness and <br />substance abuse, and a recent rise in prostitution. The district is impacted economically <br />by a negative public image associated with these problems. The public perception of <br />problems suppresses business interests and investment. Vacant storefronts adversely <br />impact the viability of the district overall. Existing businesses struggle to remain viable <br />and attract sufficient customers. <br /> <br />In the spring of 2001, a group of 60 downtown stakeholders representing property and <br />business owners, civic leaders, residents of the nearby historic district, and local <br />government representatives met to strategize a plan for revitalizing the downtown. An <br />analysis of perceived "strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats" identified <br />personal safety, drunkenness and prostitution, homelessness, and the deteriorating <br />appearance of the downtown buildings to be the most pressing issues in the district. <br /> <br />Economists with the firm ECO Northwest drafted a briefing memo in the summer of 2001 <br />outlining the market issues that are contributing to the depressed economics of the <br />downtown. Their survey of lease rates in 2001 showed that retail space rented for $.50- <br />$1.00 in Downtown Springfield. Rent rates in Downtown Eugene and the Gateway area <br />in Springfield started at $1.00 and ranged to $2.00 or more. Low lease rates discourage <br />property owners from making significant investments in their buildings. As a result, <br />redevelopment or extensive rehabilitation costs would likely exceed what owners could <br />reasonably expect to recover through their leases. A team of architects and City building <br />staff surveyed several building types that are typical of the downtown area. With the <br />exception of a few building clusters with historic character and potential for restoration, <br />most structures in the downtown area cannot be renovated in a cost effective manner <br />without significant assistance from private and public resources. <br /> <br />Springfield Downtown Redevelopment Area <br />On December 1, 2003, the Springfield City Council <br />approved an amendment to the Consolidated Plan <br />2000 which provided for the creation of the <br />Springfield Downtown Redevelopment Area, and <br />authorized the use of CDBG funds to assist with <br />activities that address blighted and decaying <br />conditions in the designated area under 24 CFR <br />§570.208(b). The Downtown Redevelopment Area <br />is bounded by B Street on the north, South A Street <br />on the south, 10th Street on the east, and Mill Street <br /> <br />74 <br /> <br /> <br />